Deficits in the Socio-educational School Inclusion Strategy for Students with Social Difficulty in Spain during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Students with administrative care measures have historically faced difficulties in achieving school goals. The Covid-19 pandemic forced the declaration of a lockdown, which accelerated changes in the schools’ pedagogical actions. This investigation analyses the strategies used by the educational system to promote the academic inclusion of students who have an open protection file in the child welfare system within the context of Covid-19. Two different phases are compared: Phase 1) from the March lockdown to the end of the 2019/20 school year; Phase 2) The first six weeks of the beginning of the 2020/21 school year. Longitudinal follow-ups were carried out with adolescents in care with a sample of N = 10 (Phase 1) and N = 11 (Phase 2). Based on the grounded theory, information is supplemented by case studies through interviews with educational professionals, N = 14 (Phase 1) and N = 11 (Phase 2). The results indicate deficits of schools’ adaptability to the situation of the students suffering social exclusion and difficulties in monitoring when students do not attend school in person and do school activities at home. It is concluded that the design of the educational policy applied in the context of the pandemic does not take the social factor into account.
Downloads
References
Ãlvarez–Sigüenza, J. (2019). Nativos digitales y brecha digital: Una visión comparativa en el uso de las TIC [Digital natives and digital gap: A comparative view on the use of ICTs]. Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 6(1), 203–23. https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.6.11.12
Amorós-MartÃ, P., Byrne, S., Mateos-Inchaurrondo, A., Vaquero-Tió, E., & Mundet-Bolós, A. (2016). Learning together, growing with family: The implementation and evaluation of a family support programme. Psychosocial Intervention, 25(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2016.02.002
Bermello, S. (2020). Retrato da teledocencia forzada: elevada desconexión, posta en valor da educación presencial e suspenso xeral da ConsellerÃa [Portrait of forced tele-teaching: High disconnection, the value of presential education, and general failure of the ConsellerÃa]. Revista Galega de Educación, Special issue(June), 24–27. http://neg.gal/almacen/documentos/NUMEROESPECIAL_RGE_COVID_XUNHO2020.pdf
BolÃvar, A., & López, L. (2009). Las grandes cifras del fracaso escolar y los riesgos de exclusión educativa [The large amount of failure and the risks of educational exclusion]. Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 13(3), 51–78.
Casas, F., & Montserrat, C. (2009). Sistema educativo e igualdad de oportunidades entre los jóvenes tutelados: estudios recientes en el Reino Unido [Educational system and equal opportunities among protected youth: Recent studies in the UK]. Psicothema, 21(4),543–547.
Cobo, C., & Narodowski, M. (2020). El incierto futuro de la educación escolar [The uncertain future of school education]. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 35, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2020.35.001
Consejo Escolar del Estado. (2020). Situación actual de la educación en España a consecuencia de la pandemia [Current situation of education in Spain as a result of the pandemic]. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/va/mc/cee/publicaciones/estudios/situacion-andemia.html
De-Juanas Oliva, Ã., GarcÃa-Castilla, F. J., & Ponce de León Elizondo, A. (2020). El tiempo de los jóvenes en dificultad social: utilización, gestión y acciones socioeducativas [The time of young people in social difficulty: Use, management, and socio-educational actions]. Revista Española de PedagogÃa, 78(277), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP78-3-2020-05
De Valenzuela, Ã. L., Gradaille, R., & Caride, J. A. (2018). Las prácticas de ocio y su educación en los procesos de inclusión social: un estudio comparado con jóvenes (ex) tutelados en Cataluña, Galicia y Madrid [Leisure practices and their education in social inclusion processes: A study comparing (ex) protected youth in Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid]. PedagogÃa Social: Revista Interuniversitaria, 31, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2018.31.03
Fernández-Simo, D., Cid Fernández, X. M., & Carrera-Fernández, M. V. (2020). Incidencia del estado de alarma en la desigualdad escolar de la adolescencia acogida por el sistema de protección en Galicia [Incidence of the State of Alarm on school inequality of adolescence under the protection system in Galicia]. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.008
Fernández-Simo, D., & Cid, X.M. (2018). Análisis longitudinal dela transición a la vida adulta de las personas segregadas del sistema de protección a la infancia y a la adolescencia [Longitudinal analysis of the transition to adulthood in excluded people who are in the Child and Adolescent Welfare System]. Bordón, 70(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2018.54539
Fernández-Simo, D., & Cid, X. M. (2016). The underage protection system in Galicia (Spain). New needs for social and educational support with teens and youth in social difficulties. In T. Suikkanen-Malin, M. Vestila, & J. Jussila (Eds.), Foster care, childhood and parenting in contemporary Europe (pp. 31–44). Publications of Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences.
Fuentes, N., Crous, G., Carmelita, M., & Rabasa, J. (2020). Com ha impactat la crisi de la covid-19 en els serveis adreçats a la infà ncia i adolescència en situació de risc a la provÃncia de Barcelona? Reptes i propostes dels i les professionals per al desenvolupament de l’acciósocioeducativa en temps de pandèmia [How has the Covid-19 crisis impacted services aimed at children and adolescents at risk in the province of Barcelona? Challenges and proposals of professionals for the development of socio-educational action in times of pandemic]. Diputació de Barcelona & FEDAIA.
Garcia-Molsosa, M., Collet-Sabé, J., & Montserrat, C. (2020). The school experience of children in residential care: A multiple case study. Child, Family and Social Work, 26, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12784
IGAXES. (2018). MemorÃa anual del año 2017 [Annual report of 2017]. (Unpublished).
Jiménez, R., Vega, L., & Vico, A (2016). Habilidades en internet de mujeres estudiantes y su relación con la inclusión digital: Nuevas brechas digitales [Online skills of female students and their relationship with digital inclusion: New digital gaps]. Education in the Knowledge Society, 17(3), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20161732948
Jóvenes e Inclusión. (2016). Jóvenes e Inclusión insta a ampliar hasta los 25 años la protección de la juventud extutelada [Youth and Inclusion urges extending the protection of ext-protected youth until age 25]. http//joveneseinclusion.org
MartÃn, E., Muñoz de Bustillo, M., RodrÃguez, T., & Pérez, Y. (2008). De la residencia a la escuela: la integración social de los menores en acogimiento residencial con el grupo de iguales en el contexto escolar [From residency to school: The social integration of minors in residential accommodation with the peer group in the school context]. Psicothema, 20(3), 376–382.
Miguelena, J., Dávila, P., & Naya, L. M. (2018). Percepciones de jóvenes procedentes del sistema de protección sobre los itinerarios educativos que siguen niñas, niños y ado-lescentes atendidos en acogimiento residencial. El caso de Gipuzkoa [Perceptions of young people under the protection system on the educational itineraries followed by girls, boys and adolescents attended to in residential care. Gipuzkoa's case]. Universidad de La Laguna: Servicio de Publicaciones.
Murillo, J., & Duk, C. (2020). El Covid-19 y las brechas educativas [Covid-19 and educational gaps]. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 14(1), 11–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782020000100011
Orte, C., Ballester, L., & Nevot-Caldentey, L. (2020). Factores de riesgo infanto-juveniles durante el confinamiento por COVID-19: revisión de medidas de prevención familiar en España [Infant-juvenile risk factors during the COVID-19 confinement: A review of family prevention measures in Spain]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 205–236. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1475
Parrilla, A., Gallego, C., & Morriña, A. (2010). El complicado tránsito a la vida activa de jóvenes en riesgo de exclusión: una perspectiva biográfica [The complicated transit to active life of young people at risk of exclusion: A biographical perspective]. Revista de Educación, 351, 211–233.
Portela, A., Nieto, J. M., & Torres, A. (2019). La reincorporación formativa de jóvenes que abandonan tempranamente la educación: relevancia de su trayectoria previa [Re-engagement in education and training of young people who leave education early: The importance of prior trajectories]. Revista Española de PedagogÃa, 77(272), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP77-1-2019-07
Reimers, F., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD. https://www.aforges.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/framework.pdf
Rodicio-GarcÃa, M. L., RÃos-de-Deus, M. P., Mosquera-González, M. J., & Penado Abilleira, M. (2020). La brecha digital en estudiantes españoles ante la crisis de la Covid-19 [The digital gap in Spanish students in the face of the Covid-19 crisis]. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 9(3), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.006
Save The Children. (2020). COVID 19: cerrar la brecha. Impacto educativo y propuestas de equidad para la desescalada [Covid-19: Closing the gap. Educational impact and equity proposals for the descaling]. Save The Children. https://www.savethechildren.es/actualidad/informe-covid-19-cerrar-la-brecha
Santana-Vega, L. E., Alonso-Bello, E., & Feliciano-GarcÃa, L. (2018). Trayectorias laborales y competencias de empleabilidad de jóvenes nacionales e inmigrantes en riesgo de exclusión social [Work trajectories and employability competences of national and immigrant youth at risk of social exclusión]. Revista Complutense de Educación, 29(2), 355–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/RCED.52444
Sebba, J., Berridge, D., Luke, N., Fletcher, J., Bell, K. Strand, S., Thomas, S., Sinclair, I., & O’Higgins, A. (2015). The educational progress of looked-after children in England: Linking care and educational data. Rees Centre for Research on Fostering and Education.
Stott, T. (2013). Transitioning youth: policies and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.10.019
Susinos, T., & Parrilla, A. (2013). Investigación inclusiva en tiempos difÃciles. Certezas provisionales y debates pendientes [Inclusive research in difficult times. Provisional certainties and pending discussions]. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 11(2), 87–98. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=55127024004
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.