The Universal Genre Sphere: A Curricular Model Integrating GBA and UDL to Promote Equitable Academic Writing Instruction for EAL University Students

  • Rosa Dene David University of British Columbia, Canada
  • Carl Edlund Anderson Facultad de Educación, Universidad de La Sabana, Colombia, and Department of Language & Literature, Signum University, USA
Keywords: Universal Design for Learning, genre-based approach, second language writing, English language learners, inclusive education


This paper proposes the design of an instructional model, referred to as the universal genre sphere, for teaching academic writing in a manner appropriate to all learners, but developed especially with consideration for the needs of English as additional language students with or without diagnosed learning differences. Despite growing research on, variously, second-language writing, English as an additional language and learning differences, there has been relatively little work that explores approaches to the intersections of these topics. Thus, the proposed universal genre sphere model is founded on the pillars of universal design for learning and the tenets of the genre-based approach, especially the teaching-learning cycle, to create more equitable and inclusive, as well as effective, learning environments. The universal genre sphere balances inclusive design that draws upon students’ interests, while breaking learning into manageable and adjustable segments, thus making academic writing more accessible to a greater number of learners. The combination of universal design for learning and the genre-based approach represents an opportunity to create a shift in second-language writing instruction (and, potentially, in L1 writing instruction) that aligns with the principles of inclusive education by reducing barriers in the classroom and providing students with multiple pathways to participate, which could do much to advance knowledge about more inclusive, equitable and effective writing instruction for all learners.


Download data is not yet available.


Adler, K. (1999). Community and technical college dropouts: A survey of students with disabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Seattle]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 468.

Anderson, P., Anson, C. M., Gonyea, R. M., & Paine, C. (2015). The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199–235.

Ainscow, M. (1998). Exploring links between special needs and school improvement. Support for Learning, 13(2), 70–75.

Ainscow, M. (2015). Towards self-improving school systems: Lessons from a city challenge. Routledge.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Aronin, L., & Bernard, S. (2010). A country in focus: Research in English language teaching and learning in Israel (2000-2009). Language Teaching, 43(3), 297–319.

Assadi, M. (2019). Enhancing Iranian EFL learners’ descriptive writing through a genre-based pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(6), 123–128.

Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2004). Taking responsibility for the quality of the baccalaureate degree. Author.

Bausela, E. (2002). Atención a la diversidad en educación superior. Profesorado: Revista de Currıculum y Formación del Profesorado, 6(1–2), 1–11.

Benfield, J. R. (2006). How authors can cope with the burden of English as an international language. CHEST Journal, 129(6), 1728.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.

Boothe, K. A., Lohmann, M. J., Donnell, K. A., & Hall, D. D. (2018). Applying principles of universal design for learning (UDL) in the college classroom. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(3), 1–13.

Brown, K., David, R., & Smallman, S. (2017). Adopting the principles of universal design into International and Global Studies programs and curriculum. Journal of International & Global Studies, 9(1), 77–92.

Callaghan, M., & Rothery, J. (1988). Teaching factual writing: A genre-based approach. DSP Literacy Project, Metropolitan East Region.

Center for Applied Special Technology. (2022). About universal design for learning.

Creighton, L. M. (2007). Factors affecting the graduation rates of university students from underrepresented populations. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 11(4), Article 7.

Crump, A. (2014). Introducing LangCrit: Critical language and race theory. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 11(3), 207–224.

Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 71–83). Springer.

David, R. D., & Brown, K. (2020). Diversity, equity, and language teacher education. In S. Conrad, A. Hartig, & L. Santelmann (Eds.), The Cambridge introduction to applied linguistics, (pp. 295–307). Cambridge University Press.

David, R. D., & Torres, C. (2020). Conceptualizing change: A proposed shift in global discourse surrounding disability in language teaching. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 9–25.

Davidson, C. N. (2017). The new education: How to revolutionize the university to prepare students for a world in flux. Hachette.

Delaney, T. A., & Hata, M. (2020). Universal design for learning in assessment: Supporting ELLs with learning disabilities. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 79–91.

De La Paz, S., & Sherman C. K. (2013). Revising strategy instruction in inclusive settings: Effects for English learners and novice writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 129–141.

Edyburn, D. (2010). Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41.

Elander, J., Harrington, K., Norton, L., Robinson, H., & Reddy, P. (2006). Complex skills and academic writing: A review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 71–90.

Firkins, A., Forey, G., & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL learners. ELT Journal, 61(4), 341–352.

Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an Additional Language: What can Goffman’s “stigma†tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77–86.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.

Gaebel, M., Zhang, T., Bunescu, L., & Stoeber, H. (2018). Learning and teaching in the European Higher Education Area. European University Association.

Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 28(5), 631–644.

Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1–15.

Horn, L., Berktold, J., & Bobbit, L. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes (NCES 1999-187). U.S Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.

Huang, L.-S. (2013). Academic English is no one’s mother tongue: Graduate and undergraduate students’ Academic English language-learning needs from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1(2), 17–29.

Herazo, J. (2012). Using a genre-based approach to promote oral communication in the Colombian English classroom. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(02), 109–126.

Herbert, K. E. D., Massey-Garrison, A., & Geva, E. (2019). A developmental examination of narrative writing in EL and ELI school children who are typical readers, poor decoders, or poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities 53(1), 36–47.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29.

Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). Longman.

Hyland, K. (2013). Second language writing: The manufacture of a social fact. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 1–2.

Jozwik, S., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y. (2020). Promoting self-advocacy through persuasive writing for English learners with learning disabilities. Rural Special Education, 39(2), 82–90.

Kamenopoulou, L. (2018). Inclusive education and disability in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan.

Kormos, J. & Smith, A. M. (2012). Teaching languages to students with specific learning differences. Multilingual Matters.

Li, H., Lin, J., Wu, H., Li, Z., & Han, M. (2021). “How do I survive exclusion?â€: Voices of students with disabilities at China’s top universities. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, Article 105738.

Ma, L. P. F. (2021). Writing in English as an additional language: Challenges encountered by doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1176–1190.

Mamiseishvili, K., & Koch, L. C. (2011). First-to-second-year persistence of students with disabilities in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54(2), 93–105.

Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: A Reader (pp. 21–29). Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10–21.

Martin J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Interacting with text: The role of dialogue in learning to read and write. Foreign Languages in China, 4(5), 66–80.

Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.

Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 21–30.

Messiou, K., Ainscow, M., Echeita, G., Goldrick, S., Hope, M., Paes, I., Sandoval, M., Simon, C., & Vitorino, T. (2016). Learning from differences: A strategy for teacher development in respect to student diversity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 45–61.

Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17.

Moriña, A., LoÌpez, R., & Molina, V. (2015). Students with disabilities in higher education: A biographical narrative approach to the role of lecturers. Higher Education Research and Development, 3(4), 147–159.

Moses, R. N., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL contexts: A literature review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385–3391.

National Education Association. (2010). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.†NEA Education Policy and Practice Department.

National Leadership Council for Liberal Education & America’s Promise. (2007). College learning for the new global century. Association of American Colleges and Universities.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.

Paiz, J. M. (2019). Queering practice: LGBTQ+ diversity and inclusion in English language teaching. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 18(4), 266–275.

Rao, K., & Meo, G. J. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to design standards-based lessons. Sage Open, 6(4), 1–12.

Riddell, S., Tinklin, T., & Wilson, A. (2004). Disabled students in higher education: A reflection on research strategies and findings. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds). Disability policy and practice: Applying the social model (pp. 81–98). The Disability Press.

Root, C. (1994). A guide to learning disabilities for the ESL classroom practitioner. TESL-Electronic Journal, 1(1), Article 4.

Rose, D., Harbour, W. S., Johnston, C., Daley, S. G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 135–151.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.

Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age. ASCD.

Santangelo, T. (2014). Why is writing so difficult for students with learning disabilities? A narrative review to inform the design of effective instruction. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 12(1), 5–20.

Sapon-Shevin, M. (2003). Inclusion: A matter of social justice. Teaching All Students, 61(2), 25–28.

Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning for the 21st century? (Education Research and Foresight Working Papers No. 13; Education Research and Foresight Working Papers). UNESCO.

Sowell, J., & Sugisaki, L. (2020). An exploration of EFL teachers’ experience with learning disability training. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(1), 114–134.

Simin, S. H., & Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 230–255.

StrnadovaÌ, I., HaÌjkovaÌ, V., & KveÌŒtonÌŒovaÌ, L. (2015). Voices of university students with disabilities: Inclusive education on the tertiary level – A reality or a distant dream? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(10), 1080–1095.

Tan, B. H. (2011). Innovative writing centers and online writing labs outside North America. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 391–418.

Taylor, S., & Sidhu, R. K. (2012). Supporting refugee students in schools: What constitutes inclusive education? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(1), 39–56.

Troia, G. A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 324–336). Guilford Press.

Torres, C., & Rao, K. (2019). UDL for language learners. Cast Publishing.

UNESCO. (2008). Inclusive education: The way of the future. UNESCO.

UNESCO, & Ministry of Education and Science Spain. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education: Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, Spain 7-10 June 1994. UNESCO.

United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. United Nations Department of Public Information.

United Nations. (2007). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Viel-Ruma, K., Houchins, D. V., Jolivette, K., Fredrick, L. D., & Gama, R. (2010). Direct instruction in written expression: The effects of English speakers and English language learners with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(2), 97–108.

Wagner, T. (2008a). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need - and what we can do. Basic Books.

Wagner, T. (2008b). Rigor redefined: Even our “best†schools are failing to prepare students for 21st-century careers and citizenship. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20–24.

World Health Organization & World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. WHO & WB.

Young, D., & Schaefer, M. Y. (2019). Collaborative support for students with disabilities. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & P. Bennett (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion (pp. 136–42). JALT.

Zehler, A. M., Hopstock, P. J., Fleischman, H. L., & Greniuk, C. (1994). An examination of assessment of limited English proficient students. Development Associates, Special Issues Analysis Center.

Zhang, Y., Rebrina, F., Sabirova, F. & Afanaseva, J. (2020). Blended learning environments in inclusive education at the university. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 145–161.

How to Cite
David, R. D., & Anderson , C. E. (2022). The Universal Genre Sphere: A Curricular Model Integrating GBA and UDL to Promote Equitable Academic Writing Instruction for EAL University Students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(4), 35-52.