Determining Pre-Service Teachers’ Astronomy-Related Self-Efficacy Belief Levels
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the astronomy-related self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service teachers studying science education, primary school education, and social studies education programmes. The study is conducted using the survey design, a quantitative research method. The study sample consists of 322 pre-service teachers in their third or fourth year of a science education, primary school education, or social studies education programme at a university in Turkey’s Central Anatolia Region during the 2016 fall semester. The Astronomy Teaching Self-Efficacy Belief Scale developed by Güneş was used as the data collection tool. SPSS 22 was used to analyse the data, and the analyses benefited from descriptive and inferential statistics. Based on the findings, the pre-service teachers’ total scores for astronomy self-efficacy showed no significant difference in terms of certain variables (i.e., gender, age, year, and having taken a previous astronomy course). However, significant differences were found regarding self-efficacy scores in terms of the programme and having taken part in astronomy and sky-gazing activity. Concerning the obtained results, the following suggestions can be made: pre-service teachers should be actively involved during the astronomy course, and their classroom management experiences should be promoted to improve their astronomy self-efficacy belief levels.
Downloads
References
Akimkhanova, Zh. Ye., Turekhanova, K. M., Rochowicz, K., & Karwasz, G. P. (2020). Interactive lectures and role playing in teaching physics and astronomy. Journal of Educational Sciences, 64(3), 84–94.
Akbaş, A., & Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2006). The investigation of the pre-service elementary teachers’ science instruction self-efficacy beliefs according to their gender, type of education, and universities. Mersin University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 2(1), 98–110.
Anderman, E. M., & Young, J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811–831.
Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28–32.
Atanackovic, O., & Arbutina, B. (2021). Astronomy education in Serbia 2017–2020. Publications of the Astronomical Observatory of Belgrade, 100, 203–210.
Bağdiken, P., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi özgüven düzeylerinin incelenmesi [An Investigation of Science Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Confidence Levels] Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(2), 535–566.
Bailey, J. M., Lombardi, D., Cordova, J. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Meeting students halfway: Increasing self-efficacy and promoting knowledge change in astronomy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–19.
Baloğlu Uğurlu, N. (2005). Misconceptions of the sixth year students of primary education on the earth and the universe. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 25(1), 229–249.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. Academic Press, 1998).
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 151(2), 269-290.
Bostan, A. (2008). Different age group students’ ideas about some basic astronomy concepts. Unpublished Master Thesis, Balıkesir University.
Bozkurt Uluçay, Ö., & Akıllı, M. (2021). Investigation of primary school teachers’ self efficacy beliefs for science teaching and modeling of source effects. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 34(2), 745–777.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science selfâ€efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.
Bülbül, E., İyibil, Ü.G. & Şahin, Ç. (2013). Determination of elementary school 8th grade students’ perceptions about the astronomy concept. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(3), 182–191.
Can, A. (2014). Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS. Pegem A.
Carter, B. (2005). Sources of self-efficacy in an undergraduate ıntroductory astronomy course for non-science majors. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Maryland.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153.
Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students’ academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42(2), 197–205.
Cin, M. (2007). Alternative views of the solar systems among Turkish students. International Review of Education, 53(1), 39–53.
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 56(5), 754.
Çakıroğlu, J., Çakıroğlu, E., & Bone, W.J. (2005). Pre-service teacher self-efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching: a comparison of pre-service science teachers in Turkey and the USA. Science Educator, 14(1), 31–40.
Çepni, S. (2012). Introduction to research and project studies. Celepler Matbaacılık.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL practices. Pegem Academy.
Demirci, F. (2017). Science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about astronomy subjects teaching: A mixed method research. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ordu University.
Demirtaş, H., Cömert, M., & Özer, N. (2011). The relationship between teacher candidates’ attitudes towards teaching profession and self-efficacy perceptions. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 96–111.
Durukan, Ü. G., & Sağlam Arslan, A. (2013). Analysis of science teacher candidates' relation to basic astronomy concepts. Fen Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Derneği Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(2), 97–109.
Ekici, G. (2009). Adaptation of the biology self-efficacy scale to Turkish. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 111–124.
Ekici, G. (2012). Academic self-efficacy scale: Aadaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43(43), 174–185.
Formanek, M. Sanlyn, B., Impey, C., & Wenger, M. (2019). Relationship between learners’ motivation and course engagement in an astronomy massive open online course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15 2(15), 1–15.
Fraenkel, J. K., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.
Göncü, Ö., & Korur, F. (2012). Determination of the misconceptions of elementary students in astronomy based units by three-stage test. Paper presented at the X. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Niğde.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-645.
Gülten, D., Poyraz, C., & Soytürk, Ä°. (2012). Examining mathematics literacy self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in terms of “study habitsâ€. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 143–149.
Güneş, G. (2010). The analyse of the relation between astronomy knowledge with the nature of science and the astronomy self-efficacy belief of pre-service teachers. Unpublished Master Thesis, Çukurova University.
Høigaard, R., KovaÄ, V., Øverby, N., & Haugen, T. (2015). Academic self-efficacy mediates the effects of school psychological climate on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000056
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
İskenderoğlu, T. A., Türk, Y., & İskenderoğlu, M. (2016). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ awareness of ability to use concrete materials and their self-efficacy in the useage thereof in mathematics education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(39), 1–15.
İyibil, Ü., & Sağlam Arslan, A. (2010). Pre-service physics teachers’ mental models about stars. NEF-EFMED, 4(2), 25–46.
Jansri, S., & Ketpichainarong, W. (2020). Investigating in-service science teachers conceptions of astronomy, and determine the obstacles in teaching astronomy in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(4), 745–758.
Kanlı, U. (2014). A research on determining the conceptual understanding of students, teacher candidates and teachers in basic astronomy subjects. XI. Paper presented at the National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Adana.
Kaplan, G. & Çifçi Tekinarslan, İ. (2013). A comparison of knowledge levels of students with and without intellectual disabilities about astronomy concepts. Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 614–627.
Karasar, N. (2011). Scientific research methods. Nobel.
Kaya, S. (2013). The change in elementary pre-service teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs after science methods course. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(21), 55–69.
Küçüközer, H. (2007). Prospective science teachers’ conceptions about astronomical subjects. Science Education International, 18(2), 113–130.
Küçüközer, H., Küçüközer, A., Yüzümezoğlu, K., & Korkusuz, M., E. (2010). Elementary school students’ conceptions regarding astronomical phenomena. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5(1), 521–537.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Pearson Education
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2008). Teacher competencies-Classroom teacher special field competencies. Directorate of State Books.
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2009). Primary school 1st, 2nd and 3rd grade life science lesson curriculum and guide. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2010). Social studies course (grades 4-5) curriculum and guide. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx/program2.aspx?islem=1&kno=38
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2013). Primary school science course (3-8th grades) curriculum. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2018a). Primary school science lesson (primary and secondary school grades 3-8) curriculum. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
MoNE [Ministry of National Education]. (2018b). Social Studies Course Curriculum (Primary, Secondary, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Grades). http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812103847686-SOSYAL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LER%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20.pdf
Nie,Y., Tan, G. H., Liau, A. K., Lau, S., & Chua, B. L. (2013). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: Its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. educational research for policy and practice, 12(1), 67–77.
Oğuz, A. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının akademik öz yeterlik inançları [Academic self-efficacy beliefs of prospective primary school teachers]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(2), 15–28.
Oğuz, S., Kurnaz, M.A., Karatekin, K., & İbret, B.Ü. (2012). Perceptions of classroom teacher candidates on the phases of the moon. Paper presented at the 11th National Primary Education Symposium, Rize.
Özenoğlu-Kiremit, H. (2006). Pre-service science teachers’ self-effcacy beliefs in teaching biology. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University.
Özkan, Ö., Tekkaya, C., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2002). Understanding of science concepts of science teacher candidates, attitudes towards science teaching and self-efficacy beliefs. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Proceedings Book, Volume II, 1300-1304, Ankara.
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Clearing up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Open University Press.
Pasachoff, J., & Percy, J. (2005). Teaching and learning astronomy: Effective strategies for educators worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Plummer, J., D. (2006). Students’ development of astronomy concepts across time. PhD Thesis, The University of Michigan, ABD.
Pundak, D., Liberman, I., & Shacham, M. (2017). From conceptual frameworks to mental models for astronomy: students’ perceptions. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 4(2), 109–126.
Riggs, I., & Enochs, L. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
Seferoğlu, S. S., & Akbıyık, C. (2005). A study on primary school teachers’ perceived computer self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19, 89–101.
Susman, K., & Pavlin, J. (2020). Improvements in teachers’ knowledge and understanding of basic astronomy concepts through didactic games. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 1020–1033.
Şenler, B. (2017). Examination of pre-service science teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs and views about scientific inquiry. The Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 3(2), 50–59.
Şensoy, A. (2012). Basic astronomy concepts in terms of different variables. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.
Şirin, M., & Metin Peten, D. (2020). The effects of activity-based astronomy education on pre-service science teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs. Başkent University Journal of Education, 7(2), 212–226.
Taşcan, M. (2013). Determine of science teachers knowledge level about basic astronomy subjects (The example of Malatya). Unpublished Master Thesis, İnönü University, Malatya.
Taşcan, M., & Ünal, İ. (2015). Importance of astronomy education and evaluation in terms of training programmes in Turkey. Dokuz Eylul University Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 40, 25–37.
Trundle, K., Atwood, R., & Christopher, J. (2006). Fourth grade elementary students’ conceptions of standards based lunar concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 595–616.
Trundle, K., & Troland, T. (2005). The Moon in childrens’ literatüre. Science and Children, 43(2), 40–43.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher education, 17(7), 783–805.
Uzuntiryaki, E., & Aydın, Y. Ç. (2008). Development and validation of chemistry self efficacy scale for college students. Research in Science Education,39(4), 593–551.
Vlah, N., Velki, T., & KovaÄić, E. (2021). Teachers’ self-efficacy based on symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in primary school pupils. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.746
Walan, S., & Chang Rundgren, S-N. (2014). Investigating preschool and primary school teachers´ self-efficacy and needs in teaching science: A pilot study. CEPS Journal, 4(1), 51–67.
Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Yağcı, U., & Aksoy, V. (2015). An analysis of the relationship between academic self-efficacy and teaching self-efficacy of pre-service music teachers. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(33), 84–104.
Yıldırım, H. İ., & Karataş, F. (2020). A study on the self-efficacy belief levels of secondary school students towards science learning. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 24(1), 157–176.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
