Relationships between Epistemological Beliefs and Conceptual Understanding of Evolution by Natural Selection
Abstract
This study researches relationships between 12th-grade students’ epistemological beliefs towards science and their conceptual understanding of evolution by natural selection. Forty-two 12th-grade students in a suburban high school in Cyprus, who participated in a biology course, completed measures of their: (a) epistemological beliefs towards science before the intervention of being taught evolution n (b) conceptual understanding of evolution by natural selection after evolution intervention, (c) epistemological beliefs towards science after evolution intervention. Based on previous research, we hypothesised there would be a significant relationship between students’ epistemological beliefs and their conceptual understanding of evolution by natural selection after the evolution intervention. We also hypothesised that inquiry-based intervention on evolution by natural selection would foster students’ epistemological beliefs. Our results indicate that participants’ initial epistemological beliefs predict very modestly and statistically non-significant learning achievements on conceptual understanding of evolution by natural selection. However, our results show a significant improvement in participants’ epistemological beliefs after engagement in an inquiry-based intervention on evolution by natural selection. The educational significance of this and its implications are discussed.
Downloads
References
American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS). (1994). Board Resolution. In C. Sager (Ed.), Voices for evolution (3rd ed.) (pp. 28–29). National Center for Science Education.
Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2015). Evolution theory teaching and learning: What conclusions can we get from comparisons of teachers’ and students’ conceptual ecologies in Greece and Turkey? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 841–853.
Barnes, M., Elser, J., & Brownell, S.E. (2017). Impact of a short evolution module on students’ perceived conflict between religion and evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 79 (2), 104–111.
Baytelman, A. (2015). The effects of epistemological beliefs and prior knowledge on pre-service teachers’ informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues. University of Cyprus, Faculty of Social Sciences and Education.
Baytelman, A., & Constantinou, C. P. (2016a). Development and validation of an instrument to measure epistemological beliefs in science. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & K. Hahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, part 11 (coed. Jens Dolin and per kind) (pp. 1047–1058). University of Helsinki.
Baytelman, A., & Constantinou, C. P. (2016b). Development and validation of an instrument to measure student beliefs on the nature of knowledge and learning. Themes of Science and Technology in Education, 9(3), 151–172.
Baytelman A., Iordanou K., & Constantinou C. P. (2020a). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020b). Dimensions of Epistemological Beliefs toward Science Instrument (DEBS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.
Baytelman, A.; Soros, I., Demetriou, D., Papanicolas, N., Korfiatis, K., Sfendourakis, S., & Mapouras, D. (2020c). The evolution of living organisms. Cyprus Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport and Youth.
Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2022). Prior knowledge, epistemic beliefs and socio-scientific topic context as predictors of the diversity of arguments on socio-scientific issues. In K. Korfiatis & M. Grace (Eds.), Current research in biology education (pp. 45–57). Springer.
Baytelman, A. (2022). Investigating high school teachers' professional learning needs towards biological evolution. In A. Polyzos (Eds), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference. Biology in Education, (pp. 52–53). Athens, Greece.
Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, P. C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., Karikorpi, M., Lazoudis, A., Casulleras, R. P., Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. EU 26893, European Commission.
Borgerding, L. A., Deniz, H., & Anderson, E. S. (2017). Evolution acceptance and epistemological beliefs of college biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 54(4), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21374
Branch, G., & Scott, E. C. (2008). Overcoming obstacles to evolution education: In the beginning. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(1), 53–55.
Chan, N.-M. T., Ho, I. T., & Ku, K. Y. (2011). Epistemic beliefs and critical thinking of Chinese students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.001.
Chen, J. A. (2012). Implicit theories, epistemic beliefs, and science motivation: A person-centered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 724–735.
Cheng, M. M. H., Cheng, A. Y. N., Chan, K., & Tang, S. Y. F. (2009). Pre-service teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.018
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218.
Cho, M., Lankford, D., & Wescott, D. (2011). Exploring the relationships among epistemological beliefs, nature of science, and conceptual change in the learning of evolutionary theory. Evo Edu Outreach 4(2), 313–322.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Conley, M., Pintrich, P., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204.
Cyprus Ministry of Education National Curriculum (2021). 12th-grade biology curriculum success and competence indicators for learning. Cyprus Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport and Youth.
Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.
Dunk, R. D. P. & Wiles, J. R. (2018). Changes in acceptance of evolution and associated factors during a year of introductory biology: The shifting impacts of biology knowledge, politics, religion, demographics, and understandings of the nature of science. BioRxiv, 280479. https://doi.org/10.1101/280479
Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N., Gram, W., Frazier, B. N., Tare, M., Thompson, S., et al. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 326–353.
Evans, E. M., Legare, C., & Rosengren, K. (2011). Engaging multiple epistemologies: Implications for science education. In M. Ferrari & R. Taylor (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp. 111–139). Routledge.
Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231–1256.
Greene, E. D. (1990). The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(9), 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270907
Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Reflections and future directions. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052â€009â€0128â€1
Halldén, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 541–552. doi: 10.1080/0950069880100507
Harms, U., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). The present status of evolution education. In U. Harms, & M. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered (pp. 1–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_1
Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching science through inquiry. ERIC CSMEE Digest, March. (ED 359048).
Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19–38). Routledge.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(2), 88–140.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790203
Iordanou, K. (2016). Developing epistemological understanding through argumentation in scientific and social domains. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie., 30(2–3), 109–119.
Kampourakis, K. (2020). Students’ “teleological misconceptions†in evolution education: why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science and Education, 17(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191â€007â€9075â€9
Kelemen, D., & Diyanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0601
Kelemen, D., Rottman, J., & Seston, R. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1074–1083. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030399
Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students' epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 102 (4), 243–256.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12(1), 1–8.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328.
Kuschmierz, P., Beniermann, A., & Graf, D. (2020). Development and evaluation of the knowledge about evolution 2.0 instrument (KAEVO 2.0) International Journal of Science Education 42(15), 2601–2629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1822561
Lynn, C., Glaze, A., Evans, W., & Reed, K. (2017). In C. D. Lynn, A. L. Glaze, W. A. Evans, & L. K. Reed (Eds.), Evolution education in the American South. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95139-0.
Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79.
Mason, L. (2016). Psychological perspectives on measuring epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Braten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 375–392). Routledge.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765–766.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Muis, K., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39(2), 168–183.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (1984). Science and creationism: A view from the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, R. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272.
Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science and Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972â€007â€9062â€7
Neubrand, C., & Harms, U. (2017). Tackling the difficulties in learning evolution: Effects of adaptive self-explanation prompts. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 336–348. doi:10.1080/00219266.2016.1233129
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S., Kamp, E., Manoli, C., Zacharia, Z., Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pedersen, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students' developing understanding of biology: The case of evolution. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03173548
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Future challenges and direction for theory and research on personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 389–414). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Reiss, M; Harms, U; (2019). What now for evolution education? In U. Harms & M. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education: Re-considered. (pp. 331–343).
Reiss, M., (2018). Evolution Education in England. In H. Deniz & L. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution education around the globe (pp.155–168). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_9
Rosengren, K. L., Brem, S. K., Evans, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (Eds). (2012). Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford University Press.
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10081
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Science Education's need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21107
Schiefer, J., Edelsbrunner, P., Bernholt, A., Kampa, N., & Nehring, A. (2020) Epistemic beliefs in science—A systematic integration of evidence from multiple studies. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1541–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w
Schroeder, C., Scott, T., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436–1460.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.
Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 435–443.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.
Shi, W., Ma, L., & Wang., J. (2020) Effects of inquiry-based teaching on chinese university students' epistemologies about experimental physics and learning performance. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2) 289–297.
Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001
Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387–404.
Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 1(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052â€008â€0037â€8
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.
Spindler, L., & Doherty, J. (2009). Assessment of the teaching of evolution by natural selection through a handsâ€on simulation. In Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, 6.
Southerland, S. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The shifting roles of acceptance and dispositions in understanding biological evolution. In Alsop S. (Ed.), Beyond cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (pp. 69–78). Springer.
Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325–351.
Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750106
To, C., Tenenbaum, H., & Hogh, H. (2017). Secondary school students’ reasoning about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2) 247–273. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21347
Trevors, G. J., Kendeou, P., Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. (2017). Adolescents’ epistemic profiles in the service of knowledge revision. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.005
Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students' acquisition of biological evolutionâ€related misconceptions. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 7(1), 7.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.