The Role of Wonder in Students’ Conception of and Learning About Evolution
Learning about evolution can be challenging for students, as a full understanding may require them to see the world in new ways, to master a disciplinary language and to understand complex processes. Drawing on a long line of theoretically grounded arguments of philosophers and researchers for including wonder in science teaching, we report on the results of an empirical study with the primary aim of investigating the role of wonder in students’ learning about evolution. The study was carried out through a formative intervention in which two researchers in science education collaborated with a seventh-grade teacher. Over a period of six weeks, 45 students participated in lessons and workshops aimed at eliciting a sense of wonder in relation to concepts that are known to impact the learning of evolution. We incorporated four ‘triggers’ to elicit students’ wonder in the science class: aesthetic experiences, defiance of expectations, agency and awareness of a mystery within the ordinary. Logbook entries and interviews with student pairs provided empirical material for a qualitative analysis of the role of wonder in the students’ meaning-making about, learning of and engagement in evolution. The results show that it is possible to design science teaching that triggers students’ wonder in relation to an intended learning object. The results also reveal that the participating students described their sense of wonder in qualitatively different ways and that they still struggled to make sense of the concept of evolution after six weeks of teaching.
Barnes, M. E., Evans, E. M., Hazel, A., Brownell, S. E., & Nesse, R. M. (2017). Teleological reasoning, not acceptance of evolution, impacts students’ ability to learn natural selection. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-017-0070-6
Candiotto, L. (2019). Epistemic emotions: The case of wonder. Revista de Filosofia Aurora, 31(54). https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.31.054.DS11
Cuzzolino, M. P. (2021). “The awe is in the process”: The nature and impact of professional scientists’ experiences of awe. Science Education, 105(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21625
Dawkins, R. (2000). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion and the appetite for wonder. HMH.
Demastes, S. S., Settlage Jr., J., & Good, R. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320509
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121–127.
Egan, K., Cant, A. I., & Judson, G. (2014). Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum. Routledge.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42(3), 217–266. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0749
Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
Gilbert, A., & Byers, C. C. (2017). Wonder as a tool to engage preservice elementary teachers in science learning and teaching. Science Education, 101(6), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21300
Göransson, A. C. (2021). Crossing the threshold: Visualization design and conceptual understanding of evolution. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-173337
Gottlieb, S., Keltner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2018). Awe as a scientific emotion. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 2081–2094. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12648
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
Gresch, H., & Martens, M. (2019). Teleology as a tacit dimension of teaching and learning evolution: A sociological approach to classroom interaction in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21518
Groß, J., Kremer, K., & Arnold, J. (2019). Evolution learning and creationism: Thinking in informal learning environments. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered: Understanding what works (pp. 285–305). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_16
Hadzigeorgiou. (2011). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9225-6
Hadzigeorgiou, & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and romantic science: Their contribution to science education. Science & Education, 23(10), 1963–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9711-0
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity?: Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27(9–10), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0015-7
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ISL10 Improving student learning: Theory and practice ten years on, 412–424.
National Agency for Education. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. Fritze distributör. http://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=2575
Nicholl, J., & Davies, P. (2019). Participating in an object-based learning project to support the teaching and learning of biological evolution: A case study at the grant museum of zoology. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered: Understanding what works (pp. 307–330). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_17
Paulson, S., Shiota, M. “Lani”, Henderson, C., & Filippenko, A. V. (2021). Unpacking wonder: From curiosity to comprehension. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1501(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14317
Penuel, W. R. (2014). Emerging forms of formative intervention research in education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.884137
Pobiner, B., Watson, W. A., Beardsley, P. M., & Bertka, C. M. (2019). Using human examples to teach evolution to high school students: Increasing understanding and decreasing cognitive biases and misconceptions. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered: Understanding what works (pp. 185–205). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_11
Schinkel, A. (2017). The educational importance of deep wonder. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(2), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12233
Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8
Stolberg, T. L. (2008). Wither the sense of wonder of pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science?: A preliminary study of their personal experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.005
Strickland, D. (2020). “Science is about wondering why.” Nobel Media AB. https://www.nobelprize.org/donna-strickland-science-is-about-wondering-why/
Thagard, P., & Findlay, S. (2010). Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to accepting evolution by natural selection. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8
Tibell, L. A. E., & Harms, U. (2017). Biological principles and threshold concepts for understanding natural selection. Science & Education, 26(7), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9935-x
Trotman, D. (2014). Wow! What if ? So what?: Education and the imagination of wonder: Fascination, possibilities and opportunities missed. In Wonder-Full Education. Routledge.
Valdesolo, P., Shtulman, A., & Baron, A. S. (2017). Science is awe-some: The emotional antecedents of science learning. Emotion Review, 9(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916673212
Walck-Shannon, E., Batzli, J., Pultorak, J., & Boehmer, H. (2019). Biological variation as a threshold concept: Can we measure threshold crossing? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar36. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0241
Wolbert, L., & Schinkel, A. (2021). What should schools do to promote wonder? Oxford Review of Education, 47(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1856648
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.