The Impact of the 5E Learning Model Improved with Concept Maps on Motivation

  • Lutfiye Varoglu Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Ayhan Yilmaz Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Şenol Şen Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Keywords: concept maps, motivation, lower secondary school students, 5E learning model


The examination of students’ motivation towards lessons is an important aspect of educational studies. The constructivist approach significantly impacts the improvement of students’ motivation. The present study aims to examine the use of the 5E learning model with concept maps to support students’ motivation and compare the 5E approach and the classical approach to teaching chemistry in terms of motivational dimensions. The main subject of this study is an assessment of students’ motivation using the 5E learning model, which promotes student-centred teaching. The study was conducted with 100 8th-grade lower secondary school students who attended a school in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) during the spring semester of the 2018/19 school year. The study was conducted with two randomly selected groups: experimental (EG) and control (CG). The lessons of the EG were taught using the 5E Learning Model Improved with Concept Maps, while lessons of the CG were conducted using the current, conventional teaching method. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was applied as a data collection tool in the study. Descriptive statistics and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) were used in data analysis. As a result, it was determined that the EG students’ motivation scores showed a significant difference from the CG students’ motivation scores. Furthermore, a significant difference was established between the EG and CG students’ intrinsic goal orientation and test anxiety post-test scores. Although the EG students’ averages for other sub-dimensions were higher than the CG students’ averages, no significant difference was found between the groups.


Download data is not yet available.


Abd El-Hay, S. A., El Mezayen, S. E., & Ahmed, R. E. (2018). Effect of concept mapping on problemsolving skills, competence in clinical setting and knowledge among undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 8(8), 34-46.

Aguiar, J. G., & Correia, P. R. (2016). Using concept maps as instructional materials to foster the understanding of the atomic model and matter–energy interaction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 756-765.

Akbaba, S. (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon [Motivation in education]. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, (13), 343-361.

Akgunduz, D., & Bal, Ş. (2013). The usage of concept maps for the biology subject in the 6th grade of science lesson in primary school and determination of their effect toaa the student’s behaviour and academical success. 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Toplum Eğitim Bilimleri ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi[Journal of Education and Social Educational Sciences and Social Research in the 21st Century], 2(5), 86-96.

Aktaş, M. (2013). The effect of the 5E learning model and cooperative learning method on attitude toward biology lesson. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 33(1), 109-128. Alkan, İ., & Bayri, N. (2017). A meta analysis study on the relationship between motivation for science learning and science achievement. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 32, 865-874.

Altun, S., & Erden, M. (2006). Öğrenmede motive edici stratejiler ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability study of the scale of motivating strategies in learning]. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Edu7[Edu 7:Yeditepe University], 2(1), 1-16.

Atay, A. D. (2014). Investigation on secondary school students’ motivation levels and metacognitive awareness on learning science. (Publication No. 372569) [Master’s thesis, Adnan Menderes University]. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Thesis Center. Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention?. The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45-51.

Austin, A. C., Hammond, N. B., Barrows, N., Gould, D. L., & Gould, I. R. (2018). Relating motivation and student outcomes in general organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 331-341.

Austin, L. B., & Shore, B. M. (1995). Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Physics Education, 30(1), 41-45.

Aydin, S. (2016). An analysis of the relationship between high school students’ self-efficacy, metacognitive strategy use and their academic motivation for learn biology. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(2), 53-59.

Azizoğlu, N., & Çetin, G. (2009). Six and seventh grade students’ learning styles, attitudes towards science and motivations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 171-182.

Bagci, H., & Yalin, H. İ. (2018). The effects of 5E learning cycle model in adaptive blended learning environment to students’ academic success. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 562-585.

Bektuzun, B., & Yel, M. (2019). The effect of teaching with concept map in the subject of classification of living things and biological diversity on academic achievement of the 9th grade students. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 39(1), 91-113.

Bulut, L., Oluk, N. T., & Ekmekci, G. (2021). Determining chemistry teacher candidates’ misconceptions about solutions and dissolution with concept maps. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 41(3), 1359-1407.

Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 231-239.

Bybee, R., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., van Scotter, P., Carlson, J., Westbrook, A., Landes, N., Spiegel, S., McGarrigle Stuhlsatz, M., Ellis, A., Resch, B., Thomas, H., Bloom, M., Moran, R., Getty, S., Knapp, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs CO: BSCS.

Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, Ö. (2015). Adaptation of the science motivation scale into Turkish and chemistry: Analysis of validity. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 5(1), 15-34.

Cetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, O. (2017). Conceptual understanding of acids and bases concepts and motivation to learn chemistry. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(1), 85-97.

Chawla, J., & Singh, G. (2015). Effect of concept mapping strategy on achievement in chemistry of ix graders in relation to achievement motivation. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 18(24), 53-65. Chen, C. H., Chou, Y. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2016). An augmented-reality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 567-578.

Cheng, P. H., Yang, Y. T. C., Chang, S. H. G., & Kuo, F. R. R. (2015). 5E mobile inquiry learning approach for enhancing learning motivation and scientific inquiry ability of university students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(2), 147-153.

Chiou, C. C. (2015). The comparative effect of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil concept mapping on learning motivation and achievement. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(9), 668-671.

Chyung, S. Y., Moll, A. J., & Berg, S. A. (2010). The role of intrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy, and e-learning practice in engineering education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 10(1), 22-37.

Çeliker, H. D., Tokcan, A., & Korkubilmez, S. (2015). Does motivation toward science learning affect scientific creativity? Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 12(30), 167-192.

Çömek, A., Akınoğlu, O., Elmacı, E., & Gündoğdu, T. (2016). The effect of concept mapping on students’ academic achievement and attitude in science education. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 348-363.

Demir, Y., & Emre, İ. (2020). The effect of learning activities based on 5e learning model on 4thgrade science teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(3), 573-586.

Demircioğlu, H., Aslan, A., Açıkgöz, D., Karababa, Y., & Güven, O. (2019). The effect of react strategy on the students’ academic achievements and motivations. Journal of International Social Research, 12(64), 547-561.

Derman, A., & Badeli, Ö. (2017). The investigation of the impact of the context-based teaching method supported by the 5E model in teaching 4th grade students the “pure material and mixture” topic on the students’ conceptual perceptions and their attitude towards science. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(4), 1860-1881.

Eskicioglu, A. P., & Alpat, Ş. (2017). Development of chemistry lesson motivation scale for secondary school students. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section C: Chemical Education, 2(2), 185-212.

Ferrell, B., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2016). Connecting achievement motivation to performance in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1054-1066.

Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J.T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33-57.

George, J. K. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.), Allyn & Bacon.

Gunes Yazar, O., & Nakiboglu, C. (2020). Investigation of vocational and technical Anatolian high school students’ chemistry motivation level changes based on their fields: A longitudinal study. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section C: Chemical Education, 5(2), 183-204.

Guven, G., Kozcu Cakir, N., Sulun, Y., Cetin, G., & Guven, E. (2022). Arduino-assisted robotics coding applications integrated into the 5E learning model in science teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 108-126.

Güngör Seyhan, H. (2020). An investigation of high school students’ motivation towards chemistry lesson, attitude towards chemistry lesson, self-efficacy levels and self-regulatory learning strategies in terms of some variables: Sivas province. The Educational Science and Research Journal, 1(1), 32-56.

Iyer, D.N., Sharp, B.M. & Brush, T.H. (2017). Knowledge creation and innovation performance: An exploration of competing perspectives on organizational systems. Universal Journal of Management, 5(6), 261 270.

İlter, İ., & Ünal, Ç. (2014). The effect of the activities based on 5E learning cycle model on learning process in social studies teaching: An action research. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 181(181), 295-330.

Kallner, A. (2018). Laboratory statistics. Elsevier.

Kara, F., & Kefeli, N. (2018). The effect of using concept maps on student’s success, logical thinking and attitudes towards science. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 594-619.

Karadeniz, S., Büyüköztürk, S., Akgün, O. E., Çakmak, E. K., & Demirel, F. (2008). The Turkish adaptation study of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for 12-18 year old children: Results of confirmatory factor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 108-117.

Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Ismail, Z. (2015). The effects of “Green Chemistry” on secondary school students’ understanding and motivation. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 35-43.

Keraro, F. N., Wachanga, S. W., & Orora, W. (2007). Effects of cooperative concept mapping teaching approach on secondary school students’ motivation in biology in Gucha district, Kenya. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 111-124.

Kian, T., Yusoff, W., & Rajah, S. (2014). Motivation for generations’ cohorts: An organizational justice perspective. International Journal of Management Sciences, 11(2), 536-542.

Kilic, M., & Cakmak, M. (2013). Concept maps as a tool for meaningful learning and teaching in chemistry education. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 4(4), 152-164.

Koc, R. S. G., & Sarikaya, M. (2020). The effect of the 5E learning model and the context based teaching method on achievement and permanence towards subject of light. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 430-457.

Korkut, T. Y., & Oren, F. Ş. (2018). The effect of the science stories’ supported with concept cartoons on the academic achievement, attitude and motivation. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), 38-52.

Kostova, Z., & Radoynovska, B. (2010). Motivating students’ learning using word association test and concept maps. Bulgarian Journal of Science & Education Policy, 4(1), 62–98.

Kutu, H., & Sözbilir, M. (2011). Teaching “chemistry in our lives” unit in the 9th grade chemistry course through context-based ARCS instructional model. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 30(1), 29-62.

Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251-258.

Lynch, D. J., & Trujillo, H. (2011). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1351-1365.

Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255-265.

O’Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanski E. J. (2005). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for univariate and multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). SAS Institute Inc.

Ozgun, B. B. G., & Yalcin, F. S. (2019). Concept maps for the general biology course on the effects of academic achievement and attitude. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(3), 1149-1162.

Öner, Y. E., & Yaman, S. (2020). The effect of simulation and animation supported 5E model on science achievement and motivation of prospective classroom teachers. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 183-193.

Perry, J.L., Dempster, M. & McKay, M.T. (2017) Academic self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between Scottish index of multiple deprivation and composite attainment score. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-9.

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.

Pintrich, P., & García, T. (1993). Intraindividual differences in students’ motivation and self-regulated learning. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(3), 99-107.

Pintrich, P., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. Meese (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991) A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).

Pirci, H. A., & Torun, G. (2020). The effect of 5E learning model on the academic achievement of 6thgrade students in the teaching of algebraic expressions. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(1), 494-511.

Putra, F., Nur Kholifah, I. Y., Subali, B., & Rusilowati, A. (2018). 5E-learning cycle strategy: Increasing conceptual understanding and learning motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 171-181.

Ries, K. E., Schaap, H., Loon, A. M. M., Kral, M. M., & Meijer, P. C. (2022). A literature review of open-ended concept maps as a research instrument to study knowledge and learning. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 56(1), 73-107.

Rizki, D., Yusrizal, Y., Halim, A., & Syukri, M. (2023). Application of the 5E Learning Cycle Learning Model to Increase Student Learning Motivation in Sound Wave Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 412-416.

Sari, A., & Bayram, H. (2018). Effects of concept mapping and computer assisted instruction on removing 7th grade students’ misconceptions on the matter subject. International Journal of Social Science, 67, 29-47.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research-Online, 8(2), 23-74.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research and application. Pearson.

Sharaabi-Naor, Y., Kesner, M. ve Shwartz, Y. (2014). Enhancing students’ motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of Education, 2(2), 100-123.

Singh, I. S., & Moono, K. (2015). The effect of using concept maps on student achievement in selected topics in chemistry at tertiary level. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(15), 106-116.

Snetinová, M., Kácovský, P., & Machalická, J. (2018). Hands-on experiments in the interactive physics laboratory: students’ intrinsic motivation and understanding. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 55-75.

Sungur, S. (2004). The implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. (Publication No. 153617) [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Thesis Center.

Sungur, S., & Gungoren, S. (2009). The role of classroom environment perceptions in self-regulated learning and science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 883-900.

Şen, Ş. (2015). Investigation of students’ conceptual understanding of electrochemistry and self-regulated learning skills in process oriented guided inquiry learning environment. (Publication No. 394831) [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Thesis Center.

Şen, Ş., & Yılmaz, A. (2014). Investigating high school and university students’ motivation towards chemistry: A cross age study. The Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(10), 17-37.

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

Talbert, L. E., Bonner, J., Mortezaei, K., Guregyan, C., Henbest, G., & Eichler, J. F. (2020). Revisiting the use of concept maps in a large enrollment general chemistry course: implementation and assessment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 37-50.

Tosun, C. (2013). Adaptation of chemistry motivation questionnaire-II to Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 173-202.

Tosun, C., Şenocak, E., & Özeken, Ö. (2013). The effect of problem-based learning on undergraduate students’ motivation to the general chemistry course and scientific process skill levels. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(3), 99-114.

Tosun, C., & Taşkesenligil, Y. (2012). The effect of problem based learning on student motivation towards chemistry classes and on learning strategies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1), 104-125.

Utami, D. N., & Subali, B. (2020). 5E learning cycle combined with mind mapping in excretory system: effectiveness on curiosity. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 130-142.

Varoglu, L. (2021). Effect of 5E learning model supported concept maps on students’ understanding of chemical concepts. (Publication No. 685616) [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) Thesis Center.

Yalcin Altun, S., Açışlı, S., & Turgut, Ü. (2010). The effect of five e instructional model on preservice science teachers’ attitudes towards physics laboratory and development of scientific process skills. Kastamonu University, Kastamonu Education Journal, 18(1), 147-158.

Yıldırım, H. İ., & Kansız, F. (2018). An investigation into the secondary school students’ motivation toward science learning. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 7(3), 241-268.

Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081-1094.