Digital-inclusive Transformation and Teacher Preparedness for Foreign Language Education – A Bilateral German-Norwegian Perspective
Abstract
Digitalisation and inclusion can be understood as transversal topics in pre- and in-service teachers’ professional development. Both topics have attracted considerable research activity. However, questions of digital-inclusive transformation have only rarely been discussed within the field of foreign language teaching. Researchers in the field state a pressing need to increase digital-inclusive transformation uptake in foreign language teacher education programmes to develop a transformation ‘mindset’ in (educational) stakeholders and (future) teachers. Transformation processes in education, however, interact with preparedness for digitalisation and inclusion among pre- and in-service teachers, since the attitude and the willingness of teachers to adapt to digital reality play a decisive role in improving the quality of (digitally enhanced) teaching and learning. Currently, little is known about the interrelationship between the preparedness to use digital technology for foreign language teaching and learning and the preparedness to include foreign language learners with diverse learning needs (DLN) in the digital-inclusive classroom. To this end, this bilateral cross-country study investigates factors that constitute an attitudinal component of foreign language teachers’ perceived preparedness for using digital technology with learners with diverse learning needs in Germany and Norway. The Teacher of English Preparedness to Diverse Learning Needs in the digital inclusive classroom questionnaire was administered to 221 participants. The results show a fresh perspective on preparedness for digitally enhanced inclusive teaching linked to educational system requirements for foreign language teaching. Importantly, confidence when using digital technology in the inclusive classroom is decisive. For teacher education, it is vital that the attitudinal component of teacher preparedness receives more attention throughout teacher training. It should be related to previous experience of teachers with DT in digital-inclusive environments and be part of a heuristic conceptualisation of teacher preparedness for digitalinclusive contexts.
Downloads
References
Abels, S., Stinken-Rösner, L. (2022). „Diklusion“ im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Aktuelle Positionen und Routenplanung [“Diclusion“ in teaching and learning of science – current positions and future routes]. In E.M. Watts, & C. Hoffmann (Eds.), Digitale NAWIgation von Inklusion (pp. 5–20). Springer.
Berente, N. & Seidel, S. (2022). Digital technologies: Carrier or trigger for institutional change in digital transformation? In T. Gegenhuber, C.R. Hinings, & D. Logue (Eds.), Digital transformation and institutional theorizing: Consequences, opportunities and challenges (pp. 197–209). Emerald Publishing.
Blume, C. (2020). German teachers’ digital habitus and their pandemic pedagogy. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 879–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00174-9
Blume, C., Gerlach, D., Roters, B., & Schmidt, T. (2021). Mindsets and reflection in teacher education for inclusive language classrooms. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 32(1), 25–46.
Chapman, C. & Ainscow, M. (2022). Educational equity: Pathways to success. Routledge.
Chilla, S., Doetjes, G. Vogt, K., Filk, C., Gillespie, A., Odenwald, S., Tsagari, D., & Yearwood, T. (2021, April). International perspectives on teacher training for inclusive foreign language learning: The DINGLE project. [Presentation]. Lunchtime Meetings Flensburg, Germany.
Chilla, S., & Filk, C. (2021). Inklusiv-digitale Sprachenbildung – Ein interdisziplinärer Ansatz für die Bildung von Lehrkräften [Inclusive-digital language education – an interdisciplinary approach to teacher education]. Medienimpulse, 59(4).
Ching, C.C., Basham, J.D., & Planfetti, E.S. (2005). Technology in education, technology in life. In
C. Vrasidas & G.V. Glass (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies: Preparing teachers to teach with technology (pp. 225-240). Information Age Publishing.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, L. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion Volume. Cambridge University Press.
D’Alessio, S. & Watkins, A. (2009). International comparisons of inclusive policy and practice: Are we talking about the same thing? Research in Comparative and International Education Journal, 4(3), 233–249.
Damsa, C., Langford, M., Uehara, D., & Scherer, R. (2021). Teachers’ Agency and Online Teaching in Times of Crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106793.
Dose, J. (2019). Inklusiver Englischunterricht. Eine Studie zum Status Quo in der Sekundarstufe I [Inclusive English as a foreign language teaching. A status quo study on secondary schools]. Springer.
Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2019). Digitalisierung und Bildungsgerechtigkeit. Die schulische Perspektive [Digitalization and educational justice. A school perspective]. Die Deutsche Schule, 111(4), 391-404.
Eickelmann, B., Bos, W., Gerick, J., Goldhammer, F., Schaumburg, H., Schwippert, K., Senkbeil, M., & Vahrenhold, J. (Eds.). (2019). ICILS 2018 #Deutschland. Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking [ICILS 2018 #Germany. Student´s computer- and information technology competencies. A second international comparison and computational thinking competencies]. Waxmann.
Filk, C. (2019). ‘Onlife’ participation for everyone! - A plea for inclusive digital education. In O. A. Burow (Ed.), School digital - how does it work? How the digital revolution is changing us and the school (pp. 62–82). Beltz.
Giesecke, M. (2002). Von den Mythen der Buchkultur zu den Visionen der Informationsgesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Quadri M.A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hajok, D. (2018). Heranwachsen mit digitalen Medien – ein neuer Sozialisationstypus? Perspektiven auf Kindheit und Jugend heute [Growing up with digital media – a new type of socialization? Perspectives on current childhood and youth]. tv diskurs – Verantwortung in audiovisuellen Medien, 22(2), 20-25.
Hartung, J., Zschoch, E., & Wahl, M. (2021). Inklusion und Digitalisierung in der Schule. Gelingensbedingungen aus der Perspektive von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern sowie Schülerinnen und Schülern [Inclusion and digitalization in schools. Teacher’s and student’s perspectives on conditions]. Medien- Pädagogik, 41, (Inklusive digitale Bildung), 55–76.
Hay, J. F., Smit, J., & Paulsen, M. (2001). Teacher preparedness for inclusive education. South African Journal of Education, 21(4), 213–218.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, 27 March). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kefallinou, A., Symeonidou, S. & Meijer, C.J.W. (2020). Understanding the value of inclusive education and its implementation: A review of the literature. Prospects, 49, 135–152.
Kim, H.J. & Kim, H. (2017). Investigating teachers’ pedagogical experiences with tablet integration in Korean rural schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 107–116.
Marci-Boehncke, G. & Blume, C. (2022). „Digital Backbone“ – inklusive digitale Medienbildung im Fachcurriculum Lehramt [“Digital Backbone” – inclusive digital media education in teacher education curricula]. In B. Standl (Ed.), Medien in der Wissenschaft: Bd. 80, Digitale Lehre nachhaltig gestalten (pp. 156–160). Waxmann.
McCarthy, A.M., Maor, D., McConney, A. & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1).
Nadrljanski, Đ., Nadrljanski, M., & Pavlinović, M. (2022). Digitalization of education. In: Ivanović, M., Klašnja-Milićević, A., Jain, L.C. (Eds.), Handbook on intelligent techniques in the educational process. Learning and analytics in intelligent systems (vol. 29). Springer.
Nijakowska, J. (2014). Dyslexia in the European EFL teacher training context. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 129–154). Springer.
Nijakowska, J., Tsagari, D., & Spanoudis, G. (2018). English as a foreign language teacher training needs and perceived preparedness to include dyslexic learners: The case of Greece, Cyprus, and Poland. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 24(4), 357–379.
Nijakowska, J., Tsagari, D., & Spanoudis, G. (2020). Cross-country comparison of EFL teacher preparedness to include dyslexic learners: Validation of a questionnaire. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 779–805.
NOKUT. (2022). Studiebarometeret 2021 – Hovedtendenser [Student evaluation 2021 – main findings]. NOKUT.
OECD. (2023). Equity and inclusion in education: Finding strength through diversity. OECD Publishing.
Petretto. D.R., Carta. S.M., Cataudella. S., Masala, I., Mascia, M.L., Penna, M. P., Piras, P., Pistis, I., & Masala, C. (2021). The use of distance learning and e-learning in students with learning disabilities: A review on the effects and some hint of analysis on the use during COVID-19 outbreak. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 17, 92–102.
Røkenes, F.M. & Krumsvik, R.J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers and Education, 97, 1–20.
Rovai, A. & Pfingsthorn, J. (2022). Good foreign language teachers pay attention to heterogeneity: Conceptualizations of differentiation and effective teaching practice in inclusive EFL classrooms by German Pre-Service Teachers. Languages, 7(3), 162.
Rüscher, A., Buchminskaia, E., Chilla, S., & Filk, C. (2022). Digitale Barrierefreiheit und die Hochschule. STUDYasU - ein proaktiver Ansatz für barriere-sensible digitale Hochschullehre [Digital accessibility and universities. STUDYasU – a proactive approach to accessible higher education teaching and learning]. In S. Voß-Nakkour, L. Rutsemeier, M. Möhring, A. Deitmer, S. Grimminger (eds.) Digitale Barrierefreiheit in der Bildung weiter denken (pp. 90–100). Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
Schuknecht, L., & Schleicher, A. (2020). Digitale Herausforderungen für Schulen und Bildung [Digital challenges for education and schools]. ifo Institut Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, ifo Schnelldienst, 73(5), 68-70.
Schulz, L., Krstoski, I., Lüneberger, M., & Wichmann, D. (Eds.) (2022). Diklusive Lernwelten. Zeitgemäßes Lernen für alle Schüler:innen [Diclusive learning environments. Contemporary learning for all students]. Visual Books.
Stalder, F. (2016). Kultur der Digitalität [Digital culture]. Suhrkamp.
Symeonidis, V. (2018). Revisiting the European teacher education area: the transformation of teacher education policies and practices in Europe. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(3), 13–34.
Štemberger, T. & Čotar Konrad, S. (2021). Attitudes towards using digital technologies in education as an important factor in developing digital competence: The case of Slovenian student teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(14), 83–98.
Teo, T. (2009). The Impact of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward computer use: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 89–109.
Tian, W., Louw, S., & Khan, M. K. (2021). Covid-19 as a critical incident: Reflection on language assessment literacy and the need for radical changes. System, 103, Article 102682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102682
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.
van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education, 3, Article 100100.
Vassilakopoulou, P. & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers 25, 955–969.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Vold, E.T. (2017). Qualifying foreign language teachers: Is teacher training enough? International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 40–53.
Viberg, O., Mavroudi, A., Khalil, M., & Bälters, O. (2020). Validating an instrument to measure teachers ’preparedness to use digital technology in their teaching. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-01-04
Vogt, K. & Chilla, S. (2021). Freies Format 4: Inklusiver Fremdsprachenunterricht in Zeiten digitaler Transformation – Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen [Free Format 4: Inclsuive foreign language teaching and digital transformation – opportunities and challenges]. In M. Eisenmann & J. Steinbock (Eds.), Sprache, Kulturen, Identitäten: Umbrüche durch Digitalisierung? (pp. 355-358). Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2023, June 8). Emergency remote language assessment (ERLA): The impact of Covid-19 on language assessment in higher education. [Poster presentation]. 44th Language Testing Research Colloquium (LTRC), New York, USA.
Vogt, K. (2023, 16 June). Universal design for learning in classroom-based language assessment. [Keynote address]. Final SCALED Conference, Warsaw, Poland.
Yureva, O.V., Burganova, L.A., Kukushkina, O.Y., Myagkov, G.P. & Syradoev, D.V. (2020). Digital transformation and its risks in Higher Education: Students’ and teachers’ attitude. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11b), 5965–5971.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
