Inquiry-Based Chemistry Education Activities in a Non-formal Educational Setting for Gifted Students
Abstract
Student giftedness is a complex, developmentally dynamic and contextual phenomenon that teachers confront every day. In the classroom, teachers often meet students who have exceptional potential or achieve very high learning goals. The aim of this study is to illustrate the evaluation of inquiry-based learning activities in a specific context (Diversity in Science towards Social Inclusion learning modules) implemented in a non-formal educational setting for gifted students in relation to their level of individual interest and their autonomous and controlled motivation, comparing different groups of students. We investigate how these activities affect the students’ attitudes towards inquiry-based learning, their situational interest and their interest in science careers. A total of 264 Slovenian lower secondary school students participated in the study. The students participated in non-adapted and adapted activities based on the inquiry-based learning approach. The data were collected using pre- and post-activity questionnaires. Participation in the study, which took place in the period between the 2021/22 and the 2022/23 school years, was voluntary. The data was collected anonymously and used for research purposes only. The results show several statistically significant differences in how students’ level of individual interest, autonomous motivation and controlled motivation for learning chemistry affects their attitudes towards inquiry-based learning, their situational interest in Diversity in Science towards Social Inclusion activities and their interest in science careers. For the gifted and non-gifted students who participated in “Forensics Science†lab activities before and after the adaptations to the modules, the results related to their attitudes towards inquiry-based learning and situational interest are also reported. Thus, the results of the study provide useful insights for researchers in the field of chemistry education as well as for chemistry teachers in lower and upper secondary schools. The presented study is a good example of best practices that chemistry teachers can apply in teaching chemistry, thus enabling all students, not only the gifted ones, to learn chemistry using the inquiry-based learning approach.
Downloads
References
Aktamiş, H., Hiğde, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261.
Al-Dahmit, Y., & Kreishan, L. (2013). Gifted students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and parental influence on their motivation: From the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 13–23.
Anjani, D., & Suciati, S. (2018). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning module to improve the cognitive learning outcomes. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 218(4), 155–160.
Aulia, E. V., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Agustini, R. (2018). The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based learning material on students’ science literacy skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 1–7.
Bosco, A., Santiveri, N., & Tesconi, S. (2019). Digital making in educational projects. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 51–73.
Bravo, C. J., Intriago, E. A., Holguin, J. V., Garzon, G. M., & Arcia, L. O. (2017). Motivation and autonomy in learning English as foreign language: A case study of Ecuadorian college students. English in Language Teaching, 10(2), 19–47.
Can, I., & Inel Ekici, D. (2021). Science learning through problems in gifted and talented education: Reflection and conceptual learning. Educational studies, 4(2), 1–24.
Chen, A., & Darst, P. W. (2002). Individual in situational interest. The role of gender and skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 250–269.
Cheung, D. (2018). The key factors affecting students’ individual interest in school science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 1–23.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512.
Cropper, C. (1998). Is competition an effective classroom tool for the gifted student? Gifted Child Today, 21(3), 28–31.
Dinçol Özgü, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning on gifted and talented students’ understanding of acids-bases concepts and motivation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 994–1002.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13(1), 105–122.
Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597–610.
Dunne, J., Abdulhussain, M. E., & O’Reilly, J. (2013). Investigating the potential of Irish primary school textbooks in supporting inquiry-based science education (IBSE). International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1513–1532.
Eltanahy, M., & Forawi, S. (2019). Science teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the implementation of inquiry-based learning instruction in a middle school in Dubai. Journal of Education, 199(1), 13–23.
Eysink, T. H. S., Gersen, L., & Gijlers, H. (2015). Inquiry learning for gifted children. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 63–74.
Feri, R., Soemantri, D., & Jusuf, A. (2016). The relationship between autonomous motivation and autonomy support in medical students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Medical Education, 7(3), 414–423.
Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37.
Hinnersmann, P., Hoier, K., & Dutke, S. (2020). Executing learning activities and autonomy-supportive instructions enhance autonomous motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1) 1–15.
Hornstra, L., Bakx, A., Mathijssen, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020). Motivating gifted and non-gifted students in regular primary schools: A self-determination perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 80(4), 1–12.
JuriÅ¡eviÄ, M., & Devetak, I. (2018). Learning science through PROFILES: Are the any benefits for gifted students in elementary school? In K. Taber, M. Sumida, & L. McClure (Eds.). Teaching gifted learners in STEM subjects: Developing talent in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (pp. 125–144). Routledge.
Khan, P., & O’Rourke, K. (2004). Guide to curriculum design: Enquiry-based learning, imaginative curriculum network, University of Manchester, Higher Education Academy. http://www.ceebl.manchester.ac.uk/resources/guides/kahn_2004.pdf
Kind, V. (2007). Context-based science: A ‘gift horse’ for the talented? Routledge.
Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational in situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43(3), 39–50.
Košir, K., Horvat, M., Aram, U., & Jurinec, N. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students. High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129–148.
Levinson, R. (2007). Teaching controversial socio-scientific issues to gifted and talented students. Routledge.
Linnenbrick-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 70(40), 647–671.
Little, C. A. (2012). Curriculum as motivation for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 695–705.
Liu, Y. S., He, W., & Zhao, L. (2022). Effects of inquiry learning with different task orders on fifth graders’ individual and situational interest and concept achievement in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(5), 849–861.
Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2022). The mediating-moderating model of inquiry-based learning and science self-efficacy: Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1096–1119.
Metin, N., & Kangal S. B. (2012). An examination of the self-concept of 12 to 14 year-old gifted children enrolled in science and art centres. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 37(163), 3–16.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Are students more engaged when schools offer extracurricular activities? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/22260919
Paixao, O., & Gamboa, V. (2021). Autonomous versus controlled motivation on career indecision: The mediating effect of career. Journal of Career Development, 49(4). 802–815.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(1), 47–61.
Phillips, N., & Lindsay, G. (2006). Motivation in gifted students. High ability studies, 17(1), 57–73.
Reid, N., & Ali, A. A. (2020). Making sense of learning. A research-based approach. Springer.
Renninger, A. K. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, The search for optimal motivation and performance. Educational Psychology, 13(1), 373–404.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmid, H. G. (2018). How individual interest influences situational interest and how both are related to knowledge acquisition. A microanalytical investigation. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 530–542.
Schraw, G., Floerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–224.
Snětinová, M., Kacovsky, P., & Machalicka, J. (2018). Hands-on experiments in the interactive physics laboratory: Students’ intrinsic motivation and understanding. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(1), 55–75.
Suduc, A., Bizoi, M., & Gorghiu, G. (2015). Inquiry based science learning in primary education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 205, 474–479. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815050624
State notes. (2006). Gifted and talented. http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/52/28/5228.htm
Szalay, L., Tóth, Z., & Borbás, R. (2021). Teaching of experimental design skills: Results from a longitudinal study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 1054–1073.
Tawfik, A. A., Hung, W., & Giabbanelli, P. J, (2020). Comparing how different inquiry-based approaches impact learning outcomes. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1), 1–17.
Tokmak, F., Sak, U., & Akbulut, Y. (2021). Big-fish-little-pond effect on gifted students’ academic selfconcepts: What if the big fish has adaptable academic self-concepts? Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 46(206), 91–106.
Topcu, S., & Leana-Tas¸cılar, M. Z. (2018). The role of motivation and self-esteem in the academic achievement of Turkish gifted students. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 3–18.
Trna, J. (2014). IBSE and gifted students. Science Education International, 25(1), 19–28.
Tuttle, F. B., Laurence, L. A., & Sousa, J. A. (1988). Characteristics and identification of gifted and talented students. National Education Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED298752.pdf
West, A. (2007). Practical work for gifted in science. Routledge.
Worrel, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilus, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(4), 551–576.
Žagar, D., ArtaÄ, J., BeziÄ, T., Nagy, M., & Purgaj, S. (1999) Koncept - Odkrivanje in delo z nadarjenimi uÄenci v devetletni osnovni Å¡oli. [Concept - Discovering and working with gifted students in the nine-year primary school.] Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port Republike Slovenije. https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MIZS/Dokumenti/Osnovna-sola/Ucni-nacrti/Drugikonceptualni-dokumenti/Odkrivanje_in_delo_z_nadarjenimi_ucenci.pdf
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.
