Hypothetical Art and Art Education: The Educational Role of the Method of Hypothetical Artwork Modelling
Abstract
A hypothetical artwork is an artwork that exists only as a fictional creation of an art theorist. The explicatory powers of such hypothetical artworks are mainly used by an art theorist to reflect on an art theoretical issue under consideration. Such an artwork has an intriguing and paradoxical nature. On the one hand, it is only fictitious, but, on the other hand, it tries to function as a real token, persuading the reader to trust it as if it were a real artwork. Even though this kind of argumentation can be deceiving, as it presents a statement of real art on the basis of fiction, it has some important explicatory abilities that can be put to good use
in the art educational process. In this case, the construction of the hypothetical artwork is handled as the construction of a theoretical model. The author calls such theoretical construction the method of hypothetical artwork modelling, and its result the hypothetical artwork model. Such a hypothetical artwork model can be usefully employed when one wishes
to encourage the student to become fictionally involved in the process of creation of an artwork, thus giving him or her more personal experience of problems that accompany the process of creating a real artwork. When such hypothetical experience is gained, the student can more efficiently learn about the considered art issue. In the paper, the author
demonstrates how the explicatory powers of the method of hypothetical artwork modelling can be put into educational practice regarding an issue taken from colour theory (i.e., the primary colours fallacy).
Downloads
References
Arnheim, R., & Lee, A. (1982). A Critical Account of Some of Joseph Albers’ Concepts of Color.
Leonardo, 15(2), 175.
Chellas, B. F. (1980). Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danto, A. C. (1981). The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Fish, J. C. (1981). Colour as Sensation in Visual Art and in Science. Leonardo, 14(2), 91.
Gage, J. (1993). Colour and Culture. London: Thames and Hudson.
Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, Language, and Meaning: Introduction to Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gardiner, J. H. (2008). The Making of Arguments. Charleston: Bibliobazaar.
Gensler, H. J., & Gensler, H. J. (2002). Introduction to Logic. London: Routledge.
Goethe, J. W. (1840). Theory of Colours. London: John Murray.
Hume, D. (1986). A Treatise on Human Nature. London: Penguin Books.
Itten, J. (1961). Kunst der Farbe. Ravensburg: Otto Maier Verlag.
Jameson, D. (1983). Some Misunderstandings about Color Perception, Color Mixture and Color
Measurement. Leonardo, 16(1), 41-42.
Kirsch, J. L., & Kirsch, R. A. (1988). The Anatomy of Painting Style: Description with Computer
Rules. Leonardo, 21(4), 437-444.
Kueppers, H.. Kueppers’ Theory of Color. Retrieved December 30 2008, from http://www.ipsi.
fraunhofer.de/Kueppersfarbe/en/theorie50.html.
Lee, A. (1981). A Critical Account of Some of Josef Albers’ Concepts of Color. Leonardo, 14(2), 99-105.
MoMA. Retrieved December 30 2008, from http://www.moma.org/collection/details.php?theme_id=10452§ion_id=T003497.
Selan, J. (2008). Who’s Afraid of Picasso’s Tie, or Do you See the Catch in Hypothetical Art?
Leonardo, 41(5), 536-537.
Selan, J. (2010). Exploring the Method of Hypothetical Artwork Modelling: The Case of the Primary Colours Fallacy. Leonardo, 43(3), 314-315.
Summers, D. (2003). Real Spaces: World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism. London: Phaidon Press.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
