A study-of-Religion(s)-Based Religion Education: Skills, Knowledge, and Aims
Abstract
Different approaches to religion education have been in place for a long time or developed more recently to meet growing religious and cultural plurality in European countries and schools. In this article, I summarise and discuss basic principles for a study-of-religion(s) approach to religion education, adding arguments and perspectives from critical theories about education in general. I shall also argue that national curricula for, respectively, religion education in Sweden and History in Denmark indicate that analytical-critical skills can be a central part of religion education in elementary and lower secondary public schools. The structure of the article is based on a modified version of the ‘map of history’ developed by the scholar of education and history education Rosie Turner-Bisset who has formulated principles for teaching History in primary schools. The model will be used as a framework, for systematising and discussing key principles of a study-of-religions approach to religion education with reference to three categories: 1) attitudes, 2) skills and concepts, and 3) knowledge.
Downloads
References
Alberts, W. (2007). Integrative religious education in Europe: A study-of-religions approach. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Alberts, W. (2008). Didactics of the study of religions. Numen 55(2), 300–334.
Alberts, W. (2010). The academic study of religions and integrative religious education in Europe. British Journal of Religious Education, 32(3), 275–290.
Andreassen, B. O. (2008). ’Et ordinært fag i særklasse’: en analyse av fagdidaktiske perspektiver i innføringsbøker i religionsdidaktikk [A special subject: An analysis of didactic perspectives in didactic teaching books]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
Andreassen, B. O. (2013). Religion education in Norway: Tension or harmony between human rights and Christian cultural heritage? Temenos. Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 49(2), 137–164.
Andreassen, B. O. (2014). Christianity as culture and religions as religions. An analysis of the core curriculum as framework for Norwegian RE. British Journal of Religious Education, 36(3), 265–281.
Andreassen, B. O. (2016). Religionsdidaktikk. En innføring [Didactics of religion. An introduction] (2nd ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion. Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore & London, UK: The John Hopkins University Press.
Benner, D. (2005). Tekster til dannelsesfilosofi: mellem etik, pædagogik og politik [Selected texts on theories of Bildung: Between ethics, pedagogy and politics]. Aarhus, DK: Klim.
Berglund, J. (2013). Swedish religion education: Objective but marinated in Lutheran Protestantism? Temenos. Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 49(2), 165–184.
Biesta, G. (2013). Demokratilæring i skole og samfund: uddannelse, livslang læring og medborgerskabets politik [Learning democracy in school and society]. Aarhus, DK: Klim.
Buchardt, M. (2014). Religion and culture as identity politics in the classroom. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Böwadt, P. R. (2009). The courage to be: The impact of Lebensphilosophie on Danish RE. British Journal of Religious Education, 31(1), 29–39.
Conroy, J. C., Lundie, C., Baumfield, V., Barnes, L. P., Gallagher, T. et al. (2013). Does religious education work? A multi-dimensional investigation. London, UK & New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
Council of Europe. (2002). Recommendation Rec (2002)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on education for democratic citizenship. Retrieved from www.coe.int
Council of Europe. (2008a). White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue. Retrieved from www.coe.int
Council of Europe. (2008b). Recommendation CM/Rec (2008)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the dimension of religions and non-religious convictions within intercultural education. Retrieved from www.coe.int
Fancourt, N. (2005). Challenges for self-assessment in religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 27(2), 115–125.
Feldt, L., & Høgel, C. (2018). Reframing authority - The role of media and materiality. In L. Feldt & C. Høgel (Eds.), Reframing authority: The role of media and materiality (pp. 1–16). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Frank, K. (2013). Wie implementiert man einen religionskundlichen Unterricht? Analysen und Entwicklungen [How to implement a study-of-religions based religious education? Analysis and developments] In A. Hindriksen (Ed.), Religionspädagogik zwischen religionswissenschaftlichen Erwartungen und pädagogischen Ansprüchen (pp. 61–103). Bremen: Universität Bremen. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00103350-11
Frank, K. (2014). Die Konstruktion von religiösem und säkularem Wissen im schulischen Religionsunterricht [Construction of religious and secular knowledge in religious education in schools]. Zürich: Universität Zürich. Retrieved from http://www.religionswissenschaft.uzh.ch/seminar/personenliste/frank/frank_konstruktion_2014.pdf
Frank, K., & Christoph, B. (2008). Religious education in Switzerland as a field of work for the study of religions: Empirical results and theoretical reflections. Numen, 55(2), 183–217.
Geertz, A. W. (2000). Global perspectives on methodology in the study of religion. In A. W. Geertz & R. T. McCutcheon (Eds.), Perspectives on method & theory in the study of religion (pp. 49–73). Leiden: Brill.
Geertz, A. W. (2015). Primitivisme og postkolonial kritik i studiet af oprindelige folks religioner [Primitivism and post-colonical critique in the study of indigenous people]. In A. W. Geertz & T. Jensen (Eds.), Religionsforskningen før og nu II. Nyere tid (pp. 215–245). Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Geertz, A. W., & McCutcheon, R. T. (2000). The role of method and theory in the IAHR. In A. W. Geertz & R. T. McCutcheon (Eds.), Perspectives on method & theory in the study of religion (pp. 3–37). Leiden: Brill.
Gilhus, I. S., & Mikaelsson, L. (2001). Nytt blikk på religion: studiet av religion i dag [New eyes on religion: The study of religions today]. Oslo: Pax.
Hughes, A. W. (2012). Abrahamic religions: On the uses and abuses of history: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Ipgrave, J. (2012). Three challenges to the common understanding of the role of RE in promoting religious tolerance. REsource. The Journal of the National Association of Teachers of Religious Education, 35(1), 10–13.
Jackson, R. (2008). Teaching about religions in the public sphere: European policy initiatives and the interpretive approach. Numen, 55(2), 151–182.
Jackson, R. (2009). The Council of Europe and education about religious diversity. British Journal of Religious Education, 31(2), 85–90.
Jackson, R. (2014). Signposts – Policy and practice for teaching about religions and non-religious worldviews in intercultural education. Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/newsroom/-/asset_publisher/ESahKwOXlcQ2/content/signposts-policy-and-practice-for-teaching-about-religions-and-non-religious-world-views-in-intercultural-education?inheritRedirect=false
Jensen, J. S. (2003). The study of religion in a new key: Theoretical and philosophical soundings in the comparative and general study of religion. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Jensen, T. (2005). European and Danish religious education: Human rights, the secular state, and 'rethinking religious education and plurality'. Religion & Education, 32(1), 60–78.
Jensen, T. (2008). RS based RE in public schools: A must for a secular state. Numen, 55(2), 123–150.
Jensen, T. (2011). Why religion education, as a matter of course, ought to be part of the public school curriculum. In L. Loobuyck & P. Franken (Eds.), Religious education in a plural, secularized society. A paradigm shift (pp. 131–149). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Jensen, T. (2013). A battlefield in the culture wars: Religious education in Danish elementary school 1989-2011. In A. Jödicke (Ed.), Religious education politics, the state, and society (pp. 25–49). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
Jensen, T. (2014). L´enseignement de la religion au Danemark: les résponses récentes à des défis européens communs [RE in Denmark: Recent responses to common European challenges]. In J.-P. Willaime (Ed.), Le défi de l´enseignement des faits religieux à l´école: résponses européennes et québécoises, (pp. 43–66). Paris: Riveneuvre
Jensen, T. (2015). Religious education (RE) in other kinds of bordertowns: Denmark as an extreme and exemplary case. In J. Berglund, T. Lundén, & P. Strandbring (Eds.), Crossings and crosses (pp. 213–238). Bosten/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Jensen, T., & Kjeldsen, K. (2013). RE in Denmark - Political and professional discourses and debates, past and present. Temenos. Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, 49(2), 185–224.
Jensen, T., & Kjeldsen, K. (2014). Baseline study. European projects and recommendations involving religious education (RE). IERS Project. intercultural education through religious studies, lifelong learning program (LLP) of the European Union. Retrieved from http://iers.unive.it/files/2014/03/Baseline_Study-European-projects-and-recommendations-involving-RE.pdf
Jödicke, A. (2013). Introduction. In A. Jödicke (Ed.), Religious education politics, the state, and society (pp. 7–22). Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.
Keast, J. (Ed.) (2007). Religious diversity and intercultural education: A reference book for schools. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from https://book.coe.int/eur/en/human-rights-education-intercultural-education/3692-religious-diversity-and-intercultural-education-a-reference-book-for-schools.html
King, R. (1999). Orientalism and religion: Postcolonial theory, India and 'the mystic east'. Florence: Routledge.
Kjeldsen, K. (2016). Kristendom i folkeskolens religionsfag. Politiske og faglige diskussioner, repræsentation og didaktisering [The status and function of Christianity in religion education in the Danish public school. Political and professional debates, representation and didactic approaches]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Faculty of Humanities, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
Kjeldsen, K. (2019). Et kristent funderet religionsfag. En undersøgelse af kristendoms særlige status i skolen [A Christian based religious education. A study on the special status of Christianity in the School]. Copenhagen: Unge Pædagoger.
Lincoln, B. (1989). Discourse and the construction of society. Comparative studies of myth, ritual, and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lincoln, B. (2006). Holy terrors: Thinking about religion after September 11. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Luther, H. M. (2000). Secular theory and the academic study of religion. In T. Jensen & M. Rothstein (Eds.), Secular theories on religion. current perspectives (pp. 137–148). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCuthenon, R. T. (2000). Critics not caretakers: The scholar of religion as public intellectual. In T. Jensen & M. Rothstein (Eds.), Secular Theories on religion. Current perspectives (pp.167–181). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
McCuthenon, R. T. (2015). The category ‘religion’ in recent publications: Twenty years later. Numen, 62(1), 119–141.
Miedema, S., Schreiner, P., Skeie, G., & Jackson, R. (2004). The European network for religious education through contextual approaches (ENRECA): Its Policy and aims. Panorama: International Journal of Comparative Religious Education and Values, 16, 10–14.
Mikaelsson, L. (2004). Gendering the history of religions. In P. Antes, A. W. Geertz, & Randi R. W. (Eds.), New approaches to the study of religion. Volume 1: Regional, critical, and historical approaches (pp. 295–315). Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Morgan, D. (2010). Introduction. The matter of belief. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Religion and material culture. The matter of belief (pp. 1–17). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
Mortensen, C. B., Rydahl, J., & Tunebjerg, M. 2002. Liv og religion 3 Lærerens Bog [Life and religion. Guide for teachers]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe). (2007). The Toledo guiding principles on teaching about religion or belief in public schools. Retrieved from www.osce.org
Paden, W. E. (2004). Comparison in the study of religion. In P. Antes, A. W. Geertz, & R. Randi (Eds.), New approaches to the study of religion. Textual, comparative, sociological and cognitive approaches. (Vol. 2, pp. 77–92). Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Said, E. (2003). Orientalism (3rd ed.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
Sjöborg, A. (2013). Religious education and intercultural understanding: Examining the role of religiosity for upper secondary students’ attitudes towards RE. British Journal of Religious Education, (35)1, 36–54.
Skolverket. (2017). Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i religionskunskap [National guidelines for religion education].
Skolverket. (2018). Kursplan. Religionskunnskap [National curricula for religion education].
Teece, G. (2008). Learning from religions as ‘skillful means’: A contribution to the debate about the identity of religious education. British Journal of Religious Education 30(3), 187–198.
Teece, G. (2010). Is it learning about and from religions, religion or religious education? And is it any wonder some teachers don’t get it? British Journal of Religious Education 32(2), 93–103.
Tillich, P. (1966 [1951]). Systematic theology (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Undervisningsministeriet. (2019a). Fælles Mål. Historie [National curricula for History].
Undervisningsministeriet. (2019b). Fælles Mål. Kristendomskundskab [National curricula for ‘Knowledge about Christianity’].
United Nations. (2006). Alliances of civilizations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/index.html
Utdanningsdirektoratiet. (2015). Læreplan i kristendom, religion, livssyn og etikk (KRLE) [National curricula for ‘Christianity, religion, worldviews and ethics’].
Weisse, W. (2007). The European research project on religion and education REDCo. An Introduction. In R. Jackson, S. Miedema, W. Weisse, & J. P. Williame (Eds.), Religion and education in Europe. Developments, contexts and debates (pp. 9–26). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Wiebe, D. (1984). The Failure of nerve in the academic study of religion. Studies of Religion 13(4), 401–422.
Willaime, J-P. (2007). Different models for religion and education in Europe. In R. Jackson, S. Miedema, W. Weisse, & J. P. Williame (Eds.), Religion and education in Europe. Developments, contexts and debates (pp. 57–66). Münster: Waxmann.
Ziehe, T. (2004). Øer af intensitet i et hav af rutine: nye tekster om ungdom, skole og kultur [New texts on youth, school and culture]. Copenhagen, DK: Politisk Revy.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
