The Age of Studies and Reports: Selected Elements Concerning the Background of Encounters Defining the Power of Education

  • Veronika TaÅ¡ner
  • Slavko Gaber
Keywords: equality, equity, mass education, the age of reports, socialist Yugoslavia/ Slovenia

Abstract

In the present paper, we discuss the time before the “age of reportsâ€. Besides the Coleman Report in the period of Coleman, the Lady Plowden Report also appeared, while there were important studies in France (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1964; Peyre, 1959) and studies that inaugurated comprehensive education in Nordic countries. We focus on the period after the World War II, which was marked by rising economic nationalism, on the one hand, and by the second wave of mass education, on the other, bearing the promise of more equality and a reduction of several social inequalities, both supposed to be ensured by school. It was a period of great expectations related to the power of education and the rise of educational meritocracy. On this background, in the second part of the paper, the authors attempt to explore the phenomenon of the aforementioned reports, which significantly questioned the power of education and, at the same time, enabled the formation of evidence-based education policies. In this part of the paper, the central place is devoted to the case of socialist Yugoslavia/Slovenia and its striving for more equality and equity through education. Through the socialist ideology of more education for all, socialist Yugoslavia, with its exaggerated stress on the unified school and its overemphasised belief in simple equality, overstepped the line between relying on comprehensive education as an important mechanism for increasing the possibility of more equal and just education, on the one hand, and the myth of the almighty unified school capable of eradicating social inequalities, especially class inequalities, on the other. With this radical approach to the reduction of inequalities, socialist policy in the then Yugoslavia paradoxically reduced the opportunity for greater equality, and even more so for more equitable education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Manuscript for Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

Beck, U. (1991). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.

Bernstein, B. (2003). Class Codes and Control IV. New York: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1964/1979). The Inheritors. Chicago: UCP.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1970/1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.

Brown, P. (1997). The “Third Wave”: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 393–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown, P., Halsey, A.H., Lauder, H., & Stuart Wells, A. (1997). The Transformation of Education and Society: An Introduction. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 1–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Duru-Bellat, M. (2000). Social inequalities in the French education system: the joint effect of individual and contextual factor. Journal of Educational Policy, 15(1), 33–40.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.

Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gaber, S. (2006). Edukacija, socialna promocija in »dedovanje« izobrazbe. Sodobna pedagogika. 57, special edition, 42–53.

Gabrič, A. (2006). Šolska reforma 1953–1963. Ljubljana: Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino.

Husen, T. (1974). Talent, equality and meritocracy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Medveš, Z. (2006). Upoštevanje drugačnosti – korak k šoli enakih možnosti. Sodobna pedagogika, 57, special edition, 10–24.

Medveš, Z. (2015). Socialist pedagogy: Caught between the myth of the fairness of the unified school and cultural hegemony. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 66(2), 14–40.

Meyer, J. W. (1977). The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.

McNamee, S. J. & Miller, R. K. Jr. (2009). The meritocracy myth. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. National Defence Education Act (NDEA). (2015). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 6.11.2015 from http://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Defense-Education-Act.

Peyre, C. (1959). L’origine sociale des élèves de l‘enseignement secondaire en France. In Ecole et société. Recherches de sociologie du travail publiées sous la direction de Pierre NAVILLE, 5. Paris, Librairie Marcel Rivière.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard: Belknap Press.

Schmidt, V. (1966/1982). Metodologija šolske reforme. In Socialistična pedagogika med etatizmom in samoupravljanjem. Ljubljana: DDU-Univerzum.

Schmidt, V. (1958). Povojni razvoj, sedanje stanje in perspektive pedagoške znanosti na Slovenskem. Sodobna pedagogika, 9(9), 227–237.

Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. New York: Clarendon Press.

Strmčnik, F. (1965). Enotna osnovna šola je bistveni element socialističnih družbenih odnosov. Sodobna pedagogika, 16(3–4), 77–98.

Strmčnik, F. (1967). Kaj ovira hitrejši razvoj osnovne šole. Sodobna pedagogika, 18(5–6), 137–158.

Strmčnik, F. (2013), Prof. Gustav Šilih, vreden pedagoškega spomina. Sodobna pedagogika, 64(3), 94–97.

SORS (2001). Popisi na Slovenskem 1948–1991; Popis 2002. Ljubljana: SURS.

Šegula, I. (1964). Učni načrt osnovne šole v teoriji in praksi. Rezultati petletnega preizkusa. Ljubljana: ZNŠ.

Troger, V. (2002). Bourdieu et l’école: la démocratisation désenchantée. SH – special edition on Bourdieu, 16–23.

Vigotski, L.S. (1934/2010). Mišljenje in govor. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta.

Walzer, J. (1983). Spheres of Justice, A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. US: Basic Books.

Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology. Trans. and ed. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford UP.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Vol.1 in 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sources:

Clarke, A. C. (2007). Remembering Sputnik: Sir Arthur C. Clarke. Retrieved 6.11.2015 from http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/space-flight/remembering-sputnik-sir-arthur-c-clarke.

Education gouv.fr. Retrieved 6.11.2015 from http://www.education.gouv.fr/cid56455/le-baccalaureat-2015-session-de-juin.html&xtmc=nombredediplome20142015&xtnp=1&xtcr=20.

EU (2020). Tertiary education attainment in 2020. Retrieved 6.11.2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/themes/2015/tertiary_education_attainment.pdf.
Published
2016-06-30
How to Cite
Tašner, V., & Gaber, S. (2016). The Age of Studies and Reports: Selected Elements Concerning the Background of Encounters Defining the Power of Education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.88