College Attendance among Low-Income Youth: Explaining Differences across Wisconsin High Schools
Abstract
Bolstering low-income students’ postsecondary participation is important to remediate these students’ disadvantages and to improve society’s overall level of education. Recent research has demonstrated that secondary schools vary considerably in their tendencies to send students to postsecondary education, but existing research has not systematically identified the school characteristics that explain this variation. Identifying these characteristics can help improve low-income students’ postsecondary outcomes. We identify relevant characteristics using population-level data from Wisconsin, a mid-size state in the United States. We first show that Wisconsin’s income-based disparities in postsecondary participation are wide, even net of academic achievement. Next, we show that several geographic characteristics of schools help explain between-secondary school variation in low-income students’ postsecondary outcomes. Finally, we test whether a dense set of school organisational features explain any remaining variation. We find that these features explain virtually no variation in secondary schools’ tendencies to send low-income students to postsecondary education.
Downloads
References
Alm, J., & Winters, J. V. (2009). Distance and intrastate college student migration. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.06.008
Altonji, J. G., & Mansfield, R. K. (2011). The role of family, school, and community characteristics in inequality in education and labor market outcomes. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity (pp. 339–358). Russell Sage.
Barron’s (2008). Barron’s profile of American colleges (28th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
Baum, S., Ma, J., & Payea, K. (2013). Education pays 2013: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. College Board.
Belley, P., & Lochner, L. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. Journal of Human Capital, 1(1), 37–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/524674
Bettinger, E. P., Terry Long, B., Oreopoulos, P., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs017
Borman, G. D., & Dowling, M. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1201–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
Byun, S., Meece, J. L., & Irvin, M. J. (2012). Rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary educational attainment revisited. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 412–437. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211416344
Castleman, B. L., & Page, L. C. (2015). Summer nudging: Can personalized text messages and peer mentor outreach increase college going among low-income high school graduates? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.008
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Conger, D., Long, M. C., & Iatarola, P. (2009). Explaining race, poverty, and gender disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20455
Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2006). The effect of school choice on participants: Evidence from randomized lotteries. Econometrica, 74(5), 1191–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x
Cutler, D. M., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). Education and health: Evaluating theories and evidence (No. w12352). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Deming, D. J., Hastings, J. S., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2014). School choice, school quality, and postsecondary attainment. American Economic Review, 104(3), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.991
Engberg, M. E., & Gilbert, A. J. (2014). The counseling opportunity structure: Examining correlates of four-year college-going rates. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 219–244.
Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9309-4
Frenette, M. (2009). Do universities benefit local youth? Evidence from the creation of new universities. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.04.004
Geppert, C., Bauer-Hofmann, S., & Hopmann, S. T. (2012). Policy reform efforts and equal opportunity-an evidence-based link? An analysis of current sector reforms in the Austrian school system. CEPS Journal, 2(2), 9–29.
Guzman, G. G. (2017). Household income: 2016. U.S. Census Bureau.
Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018004045
Hill, L. D. (2008). School strategies and the “college-linking†process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 81(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100103
Hillman, N. W. (2016). Geography of college opportunity: The case of education
deserts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 987–1021. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216653204
Hirschl, N., & Smith, C. M. (2020). Well-placed: The geography of opportunity and high school
effects on college attendance. Research in Higher Education, 61, 567–587.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09599-4
Hoffer, T., Greeley, A. M., & Coleman, J. S. (1985). Achievement growth in public and Catholic schools. Sociology of Education, 58(2), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112249
Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036
Jennings, J. L., Deming, D., Jencks, C., Lopuch, M., & Schueler, B. E. (2015). Do differences in school quality matter more than we thought? New evidence on educational opportunity in the twenty-first century. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714562006
Johnson, R. C. (2015). Follow the money: School spending from title I to adult earnings. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1(3), 50–76.
Klugman, J. (2012). How resource inequalities among high schools reproduce class advantages in college destinations. Research in Higher Education, 53(8), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9261-8
Lapid, P. (2017). Expanding college access: The impact of new universities on local enrollment. Job Market Paper, University of California.
Long, M. C., Conger, D., & Iatarola, P. (2012). Effects of High School Course-Taking on Secondary and Postsecondary Success. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211431952
McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. SUNY Press.
McDonough, P. M., & Calderone, S. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1703–1718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206289140
Michelmore, K., & Dynarski, S. (2017). The gap within the gap: Using longitudinal data to understand income differences in educational outcomes. AERA Open, 3(1), 2332858417692958. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417692958
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). National Center for Education Statistics: State-Level Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=52
Radford, A. W. (2013). Top student, top school?: How social class shapes where valedictorians go to college. University of Chicago Press.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Willms, J. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986020004307
Roscigno, V. J., & Crowley, M. L. (2001). Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment. Rural Sociology, 66(2), 268–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00067.x
Roscigno, V. J., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Crowley, M. (2006). Education and the inequalities of place. Social Forces, 84(4), 2121–2145. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0108
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001003
SardoÄ, M., & Gaber, S. (2016). The legacy of the Coleman report: Editorial. CEPS Journal, 6(2), 5–8.
Stephan, J. L., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2013). Can high schools reduce college enrollment gaps with a new counseling model? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712462624
Tach, L., Jacoby, S., Wiebe, D. J., Guerra, T., & Richmond, T. S. (2016). The effect of microneighborhood conditions on adult educational attainment in a subsidized housing intervention. Housing Policy Debate, 26(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1107118
Taylor, C., Wright, C., Davies, R., Rees, G., Evans, C., & Drinkwater, S. (2018). The effect of schools on school leavers’ university participation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(4), 590–613.
Turley, R. N. L. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200202
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2015). Child nutrition programs—income eligibility guidelines. Federal Register, 80(61), 9–10.
Webber, D. A. (2016). Are college costs worth it? How ability, major, and debt affect the returns to schooling. Economics of Education Review, 53, 296–310. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.04.007
Wolniak, G. C., & Engberg, M. E. (2007). The effects of high school feeder networks on college enrollment. The Review of Higher Education, 31(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0054
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.