Building Professional Identity during Pre-Service Teacher Education
Abstract
This article explores how university learning and the period of school placement can contribute to identity development understood as a dynamic and evolving process. From this perspective, we understand the teacher’s professional identity as an ongoing process of interpretation and re-interpretation of experiences that are shaped in professional spaces of relationship with others, where each person makes different processes of identification, representations, and attributions, creating a spiral of continuous construction or reconstruction. It is thus a phenomenon of social interaction. Data collection involved eight students, their school tutors, and university teachers within the framework of 4th-year school placements. Data analysis was organised around three dimensions of the research project: the teacher him/herself, the bond between students and the educational community, and the relationship between the school and the university. The results highlighted the need to improve the practicum, especially at the university level. Both school and university tutors are crucial in promoting and guiding dialogical processes of knowledge construction with oneself, others, and the world. However, the university has an added responsibility in this key relational process; university tutors must improve their role as mediators between students and school tutors to contribute to the development of the teaching identity in a complex and dynamic way.
Downloads
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2000). Associate teachers in pre-service education: clarifying and enhancing their role. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(3), 207–224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713676888
Branda, S., & Porta, L. (2012). Maestros que marcan. BiografÃa personal e identidad profesional en docentes memorables [Teachers who mark. Personal biography and professional identity in memorable teachers]. Profesorado. Revista de CurrÃculum y Formación Del Profesorado, 16(3), 231–243.
Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., Egan, M. W., Berrie, C. F., Hales, V., & Smith, G. (2002). Rethinking field experience: partnership teaching versus single-placement teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 68–80.
https:///doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001007
Carrasco, S., & Herraiz, F. (2020). El caso del instituto Bonavista: el aprender corporeizado y biográfico [The case of the Bonavista Institute: embodied and biographical learning]. In F. Hernández, E. Aberasturi, J. M. Sancho, & J. M. Correa (Eds.), ¿Cómo aprenden los docentes? Tránsitos entre cartografÃas, experiencias, corporeidades y afectos (pp. 125–135). Octaedro.
Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2011). Supervisión con e-portafolios y su impacto en las reflexiones de los estudiantes en el Prácticum: estudio de caso [Supervision with E-portfolios and their impact on the reflections of students in the practicum: Case study]. Revista de Educación, 354, 183–208.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Charlot, B. (2007). La relación con el saber: elementos para una teorÃa [The relationship with knowledge: Elements for a theory]. Libros del Zorzal.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Day, C. (2004). A passion for teaching. Routledge/Farmer.
Day, C. (2012). The new lives of teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-240-2_4
Domović, V., Vizek Vidović, V., & Bouillet, D. (2016). Student teachers’ beliefs about the teacher’s role in inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1194571
Flores, M. A. (2001). Person and Context in Becoming a New Teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470120067882
Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
GairÃn-Sallán, J., DÃaz-Vicario, A., del Arco Bravo, I., & Flores Alarcia, Ó. (2019). Efecto e impacto de las prácticas curriculares de los grados de educación infantil y primaria: la perspectiva de estudiantes, tutores y coordinadores [Effect and impact of the curricular practices of the infant and primary education grades: The perspective of students, tutors and coordinators]. Educación, XX1, 22(2), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.21311
Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: The core process of educational change. Educational Studies, 31(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500237488
Hauge, T. E. (2000). Student teachers’ struggle in becoming professionals: Hopes and dilemmas in teacher education. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Moller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers. International perspectives in changing times (pp. 159–172). Falmer Press.
Hernández, F., Aberasturi, E., Sancho J. M., & Correa, J.M. (2020) ¿Cómo aprenden los docentes? Tránsitos entre cartografÃas, experiencias, corporeidades y afectos [How do teachers learn? Transits between cartography, experiences, corporeality and affections]. Octaedro.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Sage.
Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. D., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.033
MartÃnez Clares, P., Pérez Cusó, P., & MartÃnez Juárez, M. (2014). Una (re)visión de la tutorÃa universitaria en los estudios de Grado [A (re)vision of university tutoring in undergraduate studies]. REDU. Revista de docencia universitaria, 12(1), 269–305. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.6425
Mendoza, M., & Covarrubias, C. G. (2014). Competencias profesionales movilizadas en el prácticum: percepciones del estudiantado del grado de maestro en educación primaria [Professional skills applied in the practicum: Pre-service primary school teacher student perceptions]. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 14(3) 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v14i3.16089
Moral, C. (2016). Estrategias para resistir a la crisis de confianza en la investigación cualitativa actual [Strategies to resist the crisis of confidence in current qualitative research]. Educación, XX1, 19(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.15582
Mule, L. (2006). Preservice teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.011
Novella, A. M. (2011). Prácticum en re-construcción: Tejiendo colectivamente un modelo de prácticas desde la innovación [Practicum in re-construction: Collectively weaving a model of practices from innovation]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 9(3), 259–280. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4019481
Ping, C., Schellings, G., & Beijaard, D. (2018). Teacher educators’ professional learning: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 93–104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.003
RodrÃguez, A., R. M., Esteban, R., Aranda, M., Blanchard, C., DomÃnguez, P., González, P. & Romero, et al. (2011). Coaching reflexivo entre iguales en el Prácticum de la formación de maestros [Reflective coaching between peers in the practicum of teacher training]. Revista de Educación, 355, 355–379. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-355-028
Sancho-Gil, J. M., Sánchez-Valero, J. A., & Domingo-Coscollola, M. (2017). Research-based insights on initial teacher education in Spain. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1320388
SolÃs, M. C., Núñez, C., Contreras, I., Rittershaussen, S., Montecinos, C., & Walker, H. (2011). Condiciones de la formación práctica de los futuros profesores [Conditions for the practical training of future teachers]. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 37(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07052011000100007
Susinos-Rada, T., & Saiz-Linares, A. (2016). Los problemas pedagógicos son mis aliados. El practicum como un proceso de reflexión e indagación colaborativa [Pedagogical problems are my allies. The practicum as a process of reflection and collaborative inquiry].
Revista de Investigación en Educación, 14(1), 5–13. https://repositorio.unican.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10902/12171/ProblemasPedagogicosAliados.pdf?sequence=1
Sorensen, P. (2014). Collaboration, dialogue and expansive learning: The use of paired and multiple placements in the school practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.010
Vidović, V., & Domović, V. (2019). Development of teachers’ beliefs as a core component of their professional identity in initial teacher education: A longitudinal perspective. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.720
Vujicić, L., Boneta, Z., & Ivković, Z. (2015). The (Co-)Construction of Knowledge within Initial Teacher Training: Experiences from Croatia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 139–157. https://www.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/146
Zabalza, M. A. (2002). La enseñanza universitaria: el escenario y sus protagonistas [University education: The stage and its protagonists]. Narcea.
Zabalza, M. A. (2011). El prácticum en la formación universitaria: Estado de la cuestión[Practicum in university education: State of the art]. Revista de Educación, 354, 21–43. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/80892
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.
