Digitisation or Digitalisation: Diverse Practices of the Distance Education Period in Finland

  • Tiina Korhonen Faculty of educational sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Leenu Juurola Faculty of educational sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Laura Salo Faculty of educational sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Johanna Airaksinen Faculty of educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
Keywords: Covid-19, digipedagogical competence, innovation, digitalisation, distance education

Abstract

This case study explores how Finnish primary school teachers orchestrated school days and how teachers and headmasters organised virtual workplace collaboration and collaborated with parents during a period of distance education forced by the Covid-19 crisis in Spring 2020. The data was collected by interviewing primary and secondary school teachers (n = 15) from eight schools in various parts of Finland. Teachers’ experiences were analysed with qualitative content analysis. In this study, the school is seen as a Complex Adaptive System (CAS) and the Covid-19 crisis as a disorder forcing teachers to adapt to a rapidly changing environment. Teachers are viewed here as innovators who address both pedagogical and digital challenges under abnormal circumstances. We identify diverse practices at different stages of digitalisation during the distance education period within four domains: 1) structures of school days, 2) forms of teaching, 3) collaborative activities of teachers and headmaster, and 4) forms of home and school collaboration. We also identify three groups of enablers of distance education practices: 1) the use of digital technology, 2) digipedagogical competence of the teachers, and 3) the ability of teachers to act as adaptive innovators. We find that teachers’ ability to innovate and to adapt pedagogical and digipedagogical expertise become critical success factors when change is forced upon the educational field. We suggest that the results of this study, portrayed as the enablers and domains of distance education, be utilised in planning post-Covid education. All stakeholders influencing schools at different levels should be included in envisioning and implementing future classroom practices of innovative post-Covid schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahtiainen, R., Asikainen, M. S., Heikonen, L., Hienonen, N., Hotulainen, R., Lindfors, P., Lindgren, E. P., Lintuvuori, M., Oinas, S., Rimpelä, A., & Vainikainen, M-P. (2020). Koulunkäynti, opetus ja hyvinvointi kouluyhteisössä koronaepidemian aikana: Ensitulokset [Schooling, teaching and well-being in the school community during the pandemc: First results]. Helsingin yliopisto: Koulutuksen arviointikeskus. https://www.helsinki.fi/fi/uutiset/koulutus-kasvatus-ja-oppiminen/koronakevat-kuormitti-huoltajia-ja-opettajia-oppilaiden-kokemukset-etaopetuksesta-vaihtelivat

Arnesen, K. T., Hveem, J., Short, C. R., West, R. E., & Barbour, M. K. (2019). K-12 online learning journal articles: Trends from two decades of scholarship. Distance Education, 40(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553566

Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15(4), 161–173.

Barras, R. (1990). Interactive innovation in financial and business services. The vanguard of the service revolution. Research Policy, 19(3), 215–237.

Cavanaugh, C. S., Barbour, M. K., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.607

Cavanaugh, C., & Clark, T. (2007). The landscape of K-12 online learning. In C. Cavanaugh & B. Blomeyer (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning (pp. 521–542). International Society for Technology in Education.

Donaldson, J. (2020). Building a digitally enhanced community of practice. Information and Learning Sciences. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0066

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. In H. Fives & Gill, M.G. (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 403–418). Routledge.

Flynn, P. (2020). DESIGN-ED: A pedagogical toolkit to support K-12 teachers’ emergency transition to remote online education. Information and Learning Sciences. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0103

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed). Teachers College Press.

Halinen, I., & Jarvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of FINLAND. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11125-008-9061-2

Iivari, N., & Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management, 55(2), 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183

Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2020). Finnish upper secondary school students’ experiences with online courses. Education in the North, 27(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.26203/jsaz-8714

Jayathirtha, G., Fields, D., Kafai, Y. B., & Chipps, J. (2020). Supporting making online: The role of artifact, teacher and peer interactions in crafting electronic textiles. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0111

Karvi [FEEC]. (2020). Korona-aika on haastanut kouluja ja oppilaitoksia kehittämään uusia hyviä käytänteitä [The Corona era has challenged schools and colleges to develop new good practices]. Kansallinen arviointikeskus, Karvi https://karvi.fi/2020/11/17/korona-aika-on-haastanut-kouluja-ja-oppilaitoksia-kehittamaan-uusia-hyvia-kaytanteita

Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014

Korhonen, T., & Lavonen, J. (2017). A New Wave of Learning in Finland: Get Started with Innovation! In S. Choo, D. Sawch, A. Villanueva, & R. Vinz (Eds.), Educating for the 21st Century: Perspectives, Policies and Practicies from Around the World (pp. 447–467). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_24

Korhonen, T., Salo,L., Seitamaa, A., Sormunen, M., Kukkonen, M,. & Forsström, H. (2021). 21st century curriculum reform in Finland: Teachers adopting programming into teaching. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Kotilainen, M-R. (2015). Itseohjautuvuuden tukeminen vieraan kielen etäopetuksessa: design-perustainen oppimisympäristön kehittämistutkimus perusasteen 5.-6. luokilla [Supporting self-guided learning in distance learning of foreign languages. Development study of design-based learning environment in elementary school grades 5 and 6]. Lapin yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-484-808-4

Lapada, A., Miguel, F., Robledo, D. A., & Alam, Z. (2020). Teachers’ covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8

Lavonen, J. (2020). Curriculum and teacher education reforms in Finland that support the development of competences for the twenty-first century. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Audacious education purposes: How governments transform the goals of education systems (pp. 65–80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_3

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R.H. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12035

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations (1st ed.). Pergamon Press.

Mäkelä, T., Mehtälä, S., Clements, K., & Seppä, J. (2020). Schools went online over one weekend: Opportunities and challenges for online education related to the covid-19 crisis. In Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2020 (pp. 77–85). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the covid pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.167

OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

Palvia, S., Aeron, P., Gupta, P., Mahapatra, D., Parida, R., Rosner, R., & Sindhi, S. (2018). Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2018.1542262

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Saari A., & Säntti J. (2018) The rhetoric of the ‘digital leap’ in Finnish educational policy documents. European Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117721373

Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on education: insights from education at a glance 2020. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.pdf

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Tanhua-Piiroinen, E. Kaarakainen, S.-S. Kaarakainen, M.-T., & Viteli, J. (2020). Digiajan peruskoulu II [Primary and secondary level school in the digital era]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 17/2020. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162236/OKM_2020_17.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Tanhua-Piiroinen, E., Kaarakainen, S.-S. Kaarakainen, M.-T.,Viteli, J., Syvänen, A., & Kivinen, A. (2019). Digiajan peruskoulu [Primary and secondary level school in the digital era]. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 6/2019. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161383/6-2019-Digiajan%20peruskoulu_.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015) Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949

Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759.

Tirri, K (2018). The purposeful teacher. In R. Monyai (Ed.), Teacher education in the 21st century. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83437

Vivitsou, M. (2019). Digitalisation in education, allusions and references. CEPS Journal, 9(3), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.706

Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006

White, D. G., & Levin, J. A. (2016). Navigating the turbulent waters of school reform. Guided by complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct24566

Published
2021-10-15
How to Cite
Korhonen, T., Juurola, L., Salo, L., & Airaksinen, J. (2021). Digitisation or Digitalisation: Diverse Practices of the Distance Education Period in Finland. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Sp.Issue), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1125