The Changing Role of Textbooks in Primary Education in the Digital Era: What Can We Learn from Reading Research?
Abstract
Textbooks have been the primary teaching tool since the 19th century. By their nature, they contained a comprehensive compilation of the content of a particular subject with the intention of explaining it; this knowledge, in turn, was usually filtered to conform to a particular society’s expectations of elementary knowledge about the natural and social environments. There has been a great deal of research on how the content of textbooks has changed in line with changing values in different societies and over different periods. However, little research has been done on how textbook reading substrates and design have changed and how these changes have affected learning and comprehension: studies that systematically examined the effects of different reading substrates and different layouts on reading and learning comprehension did not appear until the late 20th century and early 21st century. We examine such studies and PISA 2021 results to draw five conclusions for future textbook research. These conclusions indicate that screens are worse than printed texts for some types of reading, while interactivity and dynamic design are not values per se but require coherent design to improve reading performance and higher-level thinking skills.
Downloads
References
American Printing History Association. (2020, October 10). History of printing timeline. American Printing History Association. https://printinghistory.org/timeline/
Audio Publishers Association. (2021). A first look at digital audiobook tracking. https://www.audiopub.org/blog/a-first-look-at-digital-audiobook-tracking-from-the-npd-group
Baron, N. (2021). How we read now. Oxford University Press.
Benson, J. (2021). A first look at digital audiobook tracking from the NPD Group. A first look at digital audiobook tracking from The NPD Group - APA (en-US). https://www.audiopub.org/blog/a-first-look-at-digital-audiobook-tracking-from-the-npd-group
Bezemer, J., &Kress, G. (2016). The textbook in a changing multimodal landscape. In N. M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of language in multimodal contexts]. De Gruyter.
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies. The fate of reading in an electronic age. Faber and Faber.
Bokförsäljningsstatistiken. (2020). https://forlaggare.se/bokforsaljningsstatistik/
Bus, A. & Takacs, Z., & Kegel, C. (2014). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 19. 10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.004
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows. Atlantic Books.
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, R., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and metaâ€analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2010). They hear, but do not listen: Retention for podcasted material in a classroom context. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.488542
Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain. Penguin Books.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t Throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Diakidoy, I.-A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590910584
Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2015). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134
Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarezâ€Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “Online Brainâ€: How the internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
Fuchs, E., &Brock, A. (Eds.) (2018). Introduction to the Palgrave handbook on textbook studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kepic Mohar, A. (2019). The materiality of textbooks. Logos, 30(2), 26–33.
Kepic Mohar, A., & KovaÄ, M. (2021). Digitalna uÄna gradiva po pandemiji kot del Å¡olske rutine? [Digital learning materials after pandemic as part of the school routine?]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(Special Issue), 28–43.
KovaÄ, M., & van der Weel, A. (2018). Reading in a post-textual era. First Monday, 23(10). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9416/7592 https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i10.9416
Learning ally. Learning Ally - Together It’s Possible. (n.d.). https://learningally.org/
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (February 15, 2019). Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
Mayer, R. (2020). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2019). Pisa 2021 creative thinking framework - OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf
OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013). Students’ extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008
Rubery, M. (2016). The untold story of the talking book. Harvard University Press.
Sidi, Y., Shpigelman, M., Zalmanov, H., & Ackerman, R. (2017). Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing. Learning and Instruction, 51, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002
Singer, L., &Alexander, P. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.
Spitzer, M. (2019). Die smarthphone pandemie [The smartphone pandemic]. Klett-Cota Verlag.
Salmerón, L., Gil, L., & Bråten, I. (2018). Effects of reading real versus print-out versions of multiple documents on students’ sourcing and Integrated Understanding. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.002
The Swedish Book Market. (n.d.). https://www.kulturradet.se/en/swedishliterature/learn-more-swedish-book-market/
Thornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014). The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting: Implications for attention and task performance. Social Psychology 45(6), 479–488.
Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of Multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
Torkar, G. (2021). Interview with Richard E. Mayer about multimedia materials and textbooks. CEPS Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1238
Ward, A. F., Duke K., Gneezy, A., & Boss, M.W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for consumer research, 2(2), 140–154.
Wikimedia Foundation. (2021, May 27). Textbook. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textbook
Willingham, D. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understanding how the mind reads. Jossey-Bass.
Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Challenging the whole child: Reflections on best practices in learning, teaching, and leadership. ASCD.
Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the squid. Harper Collins Publishers.
Wolf, M. (2016). Tales of literacy for the 21st century: The literary agenda. Oxford University Press.
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home. The reading brain in a digital world. HarperCollins.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
