Šolska reforma in normalizacija zasebnega šolstva v Sloveniji
Povzetek
Članek obravnava dolgoročne učinke urejanja položaja zasebnega šolstva v šolski reformi iz leta 1996 in »trajnost« načelnih izhodišč, iz katerih se je izhajalo. Prikaže načelna izhodišča uvajanja zasebnega šolstva, cilje sprememb, kot so opredeljeni v Beli knjigi leta 1995, in zakonsko ureditev, ki je bila vpeljana na osnovi načelnih izhodišč. Spremlja »življenje« zakonskih rešitev in zgodovino (poskusov) sprememb zakonodaje. Zakonodajo se najprej poskuša spremeniti v parlamentu, potem pa se politika spreminjanja nadaljuje na ustavnem sodišču. Članek opisuje tudi »učinkovanje« zakonodajnih rešitev: kako se oblikuje sektor zasebnih šol in kak odnos se razvije med javnim in zasebnim šolstvom. V drugem delu članek obravnava nekatere globalne procese na področju edukacije in na tej osnovi ocenjuje »trajnostnost« ciljev, iz katerih je reforma izhajala. Teza članka je, da je glavni dosežek reforme normalizacija zasebnega šolstva v Sloveniji.
Prenosi
Literatura
Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.
Bax, S., & Chambers, A. (2006). Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System 34(1), 465–479.
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
Becker, E. (2016, August 2). Privatschulen fordern mehr Geld vom Bund [Private schools demand more money from federal authorities]. DerStandard.
https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000042137119/privatschulen-fordern-mehr-geld-vom-bund
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1999). General Comment 13. The right to education (U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1999/10). United Nations.
Constitutional Court. (2015). (2015). OdloÄba U-I-269/12-24 [Judgment U-I-269/12-24]. Ustavno sodiÅ¡Äe RS. http://www.us-rs.si/media/u-i-269-12.pdf
Divjak, M. (1995, November 18). Å tirje razlogi proti waldorfski Å¡oli: waldorfska Å¡ola in vzgoja k svobodi [Four reasons against the Waldorf school: the Waldorf school and education for freedom]. Delo.
Dolinar, F. M. (2005). Ljubljanski škofje in zavod sv. Stanislava [The bishops of Ljubljana and Zavod sv. Stanislav]. In F. M. Dolinar (Ed.), Sto let Zavoda sv. Stanislava (pp. 95–124). Družina.
Globokar, R. (2011). Katoliško šolstvo v Sloveniji od1991 do 2011 [Catholic schools in Slovenia from 1991 to 2011]. In M. Šimenc & V. Tašner (Eds.), Zasebno šolstvo v Sloveniji (pp. 35–61). Pedagoški inštitut.
Globokar, R. (2015). Uvod [Introduction]. In T. Rifel, R. Globokar & M. Weilguny (Eds.), Poslanstvo katoliških šol – odgovor na sodobne izzive (p. 7). IREŠ.
Globokar, R. (2016). Zasebno šolstvo kot obogatitev šolskega prostora [Private education as an enrichment of the educational domain]. In T. Rifel & R. Globokar (Eds.), Zasebno šolstvo za skupno dobro (pp. 7–9). IREŠ.
ECtHR (European Court of Human Rights). (2014a). O’Keeffe O’Keefe v. Ireland: Grand Chamber judgment (Application No. 35810/09). European Court of Human Rights.
ECtHR (European Court of Human Rights). (2014b). O’Keeffe O’Keefe v. Ireland: Joint partly dissentiing opinion of Judges Zupancic, Gyulumyan, Kalaydjieva, de Gaetano and Woytyczek (Application No. 35810/09). European Court of Human Rights.
Flere, S., & Klanjšek, R. (2011). Družbeni izvor staršev v zasebnem in javnem šolstvu [The social origin of parents in private and public education]. In M. Šimenc & V. Tašner (Eds.), Zasebno šolstvo v Sloveniji (pp. 81–101). Pedagoški inštitut.
Galston, W. A. (2005). The politics of polarization: Education debates in the United States. In S. Fuhrman & M. Lazerson (Eds.), The public schools (pp. 57–80). Oxford University Press.
Jarić Dauenhauer, N. (2016, January 30). Koliko hrvatskih uÄenika i zaÅ¡to ide u privatne Å¡kole? [How many Croatian students and why go to private schools?]. Tportal.hr.
https://www.tportal.hr/vijesti/clanak/koliko-hrvatskih-ucenika-i-zasto-ide-u-privatne-skole-20160129
Kosovel, I. (1997). Tretja pot – pot gnoze [The third way - the way of gnosis]. Branko.
Krek, J. (Ed.). (1996). White paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia. Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
Krek, J., & Å imenc, M. (Eds.). (1996). Private Education. Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
Krek, J., & Metljak, M. (2011). Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji [White paper on education in the Republic of Slovenia]. Zavod RS za šolstvo in šport.
Law. (1996). Zakon o organizaciji in financiranju vzgoje in izobraževanja s komentarjem [Organisation and financing of education act]. Gospodarski vestnik.
Lee, H. (2017). O’Keeffe v. Ireland: The state’s obligation to protect children from sexual assault in state schools. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 40(3), 28–40.
Ministry. (2007). Predlog sprememb Zakona o organizaciji in financiranju vzgoje in izobraževanja [Proposed amendments to the organization and financing of education act] (EVA 2007-3311-0004).
OECD. (2012). Public and private schools: How management and funding relate to their socio-economic profile. OECD Publishing.
May, C., & Finch T. (2009). Implementation, embedding, and integration: An outline of normalisation process theory. Sociology, 43(3), 535–554.
Maze, J. (2020). Normativity versus normalisation: reassembling actor-network theory through Butler and Foucault. Culture, Theory and Critique, 61(2), 1–15. https://doi.org./10.1080/14735784.2020.1780623
Protner, E. (2010). Splošnoizobraževalne zasebne šole na Slovenskem med preteklostjo in sedanjostjo [General education private schools in Slovenia between past and present]. Sodobna pedagogika, 61(5), 115–130.
Protner, E. (2017). Razvoj i aktualno stanje alternativnih pedagoških koncepata u Sloveniji [Development and current state of alternative pedagogical concepts in Slovenia]. Acta Iadertina, 14(1), 115–130.
Rifel, T. (2016). Napoti ali na poti? [Obstruction or symbiosis]. In T. Rifel & R. Globokar (Eds.), Zasebno šolstvo za skupno dobro (pp. 24–34). IREŠ.
Sahlberg, P. (2004). Teaching and globalization. Managing Global Transitions, 2(1), 65–83.
Special Rapporteur on the right to education. (2014). Privatization and the right to education (A/69/402). United Nations.
Special Rapporteur on the right to education. (2015). Report on public-private partnerships and the right to education (A/70/342). United Nations.
Special Rapporteur on the right to education. (2019). Report on Sustainable Development Goal 4 and the growth of private actors in education. United Nations.
Stres, A. (2009, August 12). Nova politika ne ocenjuje pravilno pomena zasebnih Å¡ol [The new politics does not properly assess the importance of private schools]. Siolnet. https://siol.net/novice/slovenija/stres-nova-politika-ne-ocenjuje-pravilno-pomena-zasebnih-sol-364086
Å imenc, M. (1996). Zasebno Å¡olstvo [Private education]. In J. Krek (Ed.), Zasebno Å¡olstvo: struk¬tura, primerjava razliÄnih Å¡olskih sistemov in zakonodajne reÅ¡itve v Republiki Sloveniji (pp. 9–45). Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port.
Šimenc, M. (2003). Zasebno šolstvo osem let pozneje [Private education after eight years]. Šolsko polje, 14(5–6), 125–136.
Å imenc, M. (2016). Vpliv odloÄitev Ustavnega sodiÅ¡Äa RS na koncepcijo zasebnega Å¡olstva [The influence of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia on the conception of private education]. In M. Å imenc & V. TaÅ¡ner (Eds.), Komu je napoti kakovostno javno Å¡olstvo? (pp. 47–66). CEPS.
Štuhec, I. (2014). Konceptualni nesporazumi v slovenskem šolskem sistemu [Conceptual misunderstandings in the Slovenian school system]. In T. Rifel & R. Globokar (Eds.), Zasebno šolstvo za skupno dobro (pp. 35–40). IREŠ.
The Abidjan principles. (2019). https://www.abidjanprinciples.org/
TrnavÄeviÄ, A., & Logaj, V. (2006). Internal marketing and schools: the Slovenian case study. Managing global transitions, 4(1), 79–96.
Uitz, R. (2014). O’Keeffe v Ireland brings closure to some, uncertainties to others. ECHR blog.
https://www.echrblog.com/2014/02/guest-post-on-grand-chamber-judgment-in.html
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). Privatization of Education. Teachers College Press.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
