Ali so prednosti izobraževanja na daljavo v sili resnično prednosti? Etične dileme in izsledki raziskav o izobraževanju na daljavo v sili z vidika bodočih učiteljev in temeljev pedagoških študijskih programov

  • Tatjana Hodnik Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Janez Vogrinc Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Janez Krek Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1672
Ključne besede: pedagoški študijski programi, izobraževanje na daljavo v sili, etika, učenje na daljavo, pravičnost, bodoči učitelj

Povzetek

Z marcem 2020 in v študijskem letu 2020/21 je bilo vse univerzitetno izobraževanje zaradi omejitev, uvedenih v državah, ki jih je prizadela pandemija covida-19, prisiljeno uvesti izobraževanje na daljavo v sili. V tej empirični študiji, ki vključuje reprezentativni vzorec študentov ene izmed pedagoških fakultet v Sloveniji, so bili pridobljeni podatki o pogojih in izvajanju študijskih programov prek izobraževanja na daljavo v sili. Področja preučevanja so bila: materialni pogoji za študij, pedagoški proces v izobraževanju na daljavo v sili, etičnost pravil izvedbe in ocenjevanja ter akademska skupnost. Študija prinaša analizo sprememb, ki so se zgodile pri izvajanju pedagoškega procesa med izobraževanjem na daljavo v sili z vidika študentov, in preučitev, v kolikšni meri je ta študentom zagotavljal enake možnosti. Izsledki kažejo, da je uspešnost študentov pri študiju odvisna od tehničnih pogojev in okolja; da hitri prehodi iz ene vrste študija v drugo (iz izobraževanja na daljavo v sili v hibridno ali v celoti na fakulteti) niso priporočljivi; da je pedagoški proces temeljil na konceptu neposrednega poučevanja in da se je na tej podlagi deloma prilagajal različnim razmeram; in končno, da je v oceno kakovosti in pravičnosti izobraževalnega procesa vstopila »želja po udobju«.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Anderson, L. W. (2021). Schooling interrupted: Educating children and youth in the Covid-19 era. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1128

Cohen, L., Manion, l., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed). Routledge.

Gradišek, P., & Polak, A. (2021). Insights into learning and examination experience of higher education students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 286–307.

Harting, K., & Erthal, M. (2005). History of distance learning. Information Technology. Learning and Performance Journal, 23, 35–44.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2023, February 12). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-andonline-learning

Hodnik, T., & Krek, J. (2023). Emergency remote teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: Ethical dilemmas and research results from the perspective of the foundations of teacher education study programmes. In G. Stoković, J. Lukić, & J. Stanivuković (Eds.), International scientific conference Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Experience and Lessons Learned: Book of abstracts (pp. 108–109). University of Belgrade Teacher Education Faculty, Beograd.

Hodnik, T., Krek, J., Podlogar, N., & Vogrinc, J. (2021). Quality and ethical dilemmas in the education of future teachers under the conditions of distance education. In Challenges of distance teaching in teacher education and education: [Abstracts] and programme (p. 2). University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.

Hume, D. (2006 [1748]). An enquiry concerning human understanding: A critical edition. Clarendon Press.

Karataş, F. Ö, Akaygün, S., Çelik, S., Kokoç, M., & Nur Yılmaz, S. (2021). Challenge accepted: Experiences of Turkish faculty members at the time of emergency remote teaching. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.11.Sp.Issue

Kodelja, Z. (2006). O pravičnosti v izobraževanju [On justice in education]. Krtina.

Korhonen, T., Juurola, L., Salo, L., & Airaksinen (2021). Digitisation or digitalisation: Diverse practices of the distance education period in Finland. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1125

Krek, J., Hodnik, T., Podlogar, N., & Vogrinc, J. (2021). Education of future teachers under the conditions of distance education. In A. Beka (Ed.), Kosovo International Conference on Educational Research KICER: Book of abstracts (p. 51). University of Pristhina, Faculty of Education.

Loveless, B. (2023, February 12). Distance learning: The ultimate guide to online learning. Education Corner. https://www.educationcorner.com/distance-learning/distance-online-learning-guide.html

Mäkipää, T., Hahl, K., & Luodonpää-Manni, M. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of assessment and feedback practices in Finland’s foreign language classes during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1108

Plevnik, M. (2021). The challenges of conducting practical exercises in the scope of an adapted educational process in higher education institutions during the Covid-19 epidemic. Sodobna Pedagogika, 72(138), 308–320.

Podlesek, A., Kavčič, V. (2021). Generalised anxiety in Slovenian university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 322–341.

Šimenc, M. (2021). Vloga tehnologije v vzgoji in izobraževanju ter enake možnosti učencev v obdobju pandemije [The role of technology in education and equal opportunities for students in the Covid-19 crisis]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 12–26.

Unver, E., & Sungur, A. (2022) Distance learning under the Covid-19 conditions within architectural education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 191–219.

Žerak, U., Podlogar, N., Lišić, A., Lavrih, L., Fricelj, N., & Juriševič, M. (2021). Značilnosti učne samoregulacije študentov pri študiju na daljavo med epidemijo covida-19 [Characteristics of students’ learning self-regulation in distance learning during the Covid-19 epidemic]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 234–251.

Objavljeno
2025-09-23
Kako citirati
Hodnik, T., Vogrinc, J., & Krek, J. (2025). Ali so prednosti izobraževanja na daljavo v sili resnično prednosti? Etične dileme in izsledki raziskav o izobraževanju na daljavo v sili z vidika bodočih učiteljev in temeljev pedagoških študijskih programov. Revija Centra Za študij Edukacijskih Strategij , 15(3), 191–226. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1672
Številka
Letn. 15 Št. 3 (2025): VARIA Issue
Rubrike
VARIA

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
  2. The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.