Učenje o trajnostnosti v globalnem kontekstu digitalne preobrazbe v izobraževanju učiteljev: zgledne vinjete o izkušnjah s spletnimi seminarji
Povzetek
Spletni seminarji so učinkovito digitalno orodje za učenje o trajnostnosti v globalnem kontekstu. Implementacija različnih tehnologij v izobraževanju učiteljev, kot so spletni seminarji, postaja nepogrešljiva zaradi digitalne transformacije in procesov internacionalizacije. V tem kontekstu so digitalne kompetence opisane kot ključne za kakovostno izobraževanje in trajnostno prihodnost. V izobraževanju učiteljev je malo dokazov o tem, kako je mogoče digitalna orodja uporabiti za učenje o trajnostnosti. Dveletna mednarodna študija o ciljih trajnostnega razvoja v izobraževanju učiteljev, ki temelji na projektu Teach4Reach, s predstavitvijo izbranih vinjet opisuje učne izkušnje v spletnih seminarjih. Vprašanje je, kako lahko digitalizacija podpira učenje o trajnostnosti v globalnem kontekstu kakovostnega izobraževanja. Ugotavljamo, da so spletni seminarji digitalno orodje, ki podpira pridobivanje znanja in sodelovalno učenje v mednarodnem kontekstu, vendar je treba prepoznati njihove posebne lastnosti. Vinjete ponazarjajo različne izzive in priložnosti, ki jih predstavljajo spletni seminarji, kot so: temeljna vloga moderatorjev, preprost dostop do spletnega okolja, različno vedenje udeležencev in pomanjkanje podatkov o učnih izidih.
Prenosi
Literatura
Agostini, E. (2016a). Learning in the field of tension between finding and inventing. On the creative genesis of meaning in the course of experience. Ferdinand Schöningh.
Agostini, E. (2016b). Reading vignettes: Reflective approaches to the experience of learning. In S. Baur & H. K. Peterlini (Eds.), At the side of learning. Experience protocols from teaching in South Tyrolean schools - a research report. Erfahrungsorientierte Bildungsforschung Vol. 2 (pp. 55–62). StudienVerlag.
Agostini, E., Schratz, M. & Eloff, I. (2024). Vignette Research. Research Methods. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350299412
Aydarova, E., & Marquardt, S. K. (2016). The global imperative for teacher education: Opportunities for comparative and international education. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 3(1). http://preserve.lehigh.edu/fire/
Basmanova, A., Grunina, Y., & Kargovskaya, E. (2020). Digital learning: Students’ assessment of webinars and web conferences as a tool for acquiring knowledge and skills universal. Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6960–6966.
Blignaut, A. S., & Trollip, S. R. (2003). Measuring faculty participation in asynchronous discussion forums. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 347–353.
Bosco, A., Santiveri, N., & Tesconi, A. (2019). Digital making in educational projects. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 51–73.
Brevik, L., Björk, G. Lund, A., & Stromme T. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102875.
Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Dousay, T. A., Romero-Hall, E., Trust, T., Kessler, A., Krutka, D. G., Morrison, S. A., Fischer, C., & Krutka, D. G. (2020). What should teacher educators know about technology? Perspectives and self-assessments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 1–13.
Cervera, M., & Caena, F. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence for global teacher education. European. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 451–455.
Chavez, R., & O’Donnell, J. (1998). Speaking the unpleasant: The politics of (non)engagement in the multicultural education terrain. State University of New York Press.
Cornelius, S., & Gordon, C. (2013). Facilitating learning with web conferencing recommendations based on learners’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 275–285.
Cronje, J. (2022). From face-to-face to distance: Towards flexibility in five dimensions of blended learning: lessons learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(4), 436–450.
Eloff, I., Agostini, E., Dittrich, A.-K. & Mathabathe, K. (2023). Vignettes of Gender Equality, Wellbeing and Teaching. In Mayer, C. H., Vanderheiden, E., Braun-Lewensohn, O., Chen, G., Sueda, K., Mangolothi, B., Safdar, S. & Kim, S. (Eds), Women Empowerment for a Sustainable Future World: Transcultural Positive Psychology Perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25924-1_38
Eloff, I., Mathabathe, K., Agostini, E. & Dittrich, A.-K. (2022). Teaching the Global Goals: Exploring the Experiences of Teacher Educators in an Online-Environment through Vignette Research. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 15(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015005
European Commission. (2017). Commission staff working document. Communication on School development and excellent teaching for a great start in life. European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FI/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017SC0165
Ferrari, A. (2012). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 6–25.
Flores, M. (2023). Unpacking quality in teacher education. In J. Madalińska-Michalak (Ed.), Quality in teaching and teacher education (pp. 32–49). Schöningh.
Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A metaanalysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100293.
Gegenfurtner A., Narciss, S. Fryer, L., Järvelä, S., & Harachiewicz. J. (2021). Affective learning in digital education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 630966.
Gegenfurtner, A., Schwab, N., & Ebner, C. (2018). “There’s no need to drive from A to B”: Exploring the lived experience of students and lecturers with digital learning in higher education. Bavarian Journal Applied Sciences, 4, 310–322.
Gisbert, M. (2022). Technology ecosystems to rethink universities in the digital age. GUNi world report special issue. New visions for higher education towards 2030. GUNi.
Goe, R., Ipsen, C., & Bliss, S. (2018). Pilot testing a digital career literacy training for vocational rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 61, 236–243.
International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Larsen, M. (2016). Globalisation and internationalisation of teacher education: a comparative case study of Canada and Greater China. Teaching Education, 27(4), 396–409.
Lebeničnik, M., Pitt, I., & Starčič, I. (2015). Use of online learning resources in the development of learning environments at the intersection of formal and informal learning: The student as autonomous designer. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 95–113.
Leicht, A., Heiss, J., & Won J. B. (2018). Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development. Unesco Publishing.
Luis, K., & van Velzen, B. (2012). Educational policy in an international context: Political culture and its effects. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kumar, C. (2020). Scope of education for sustainable development. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Quality Education (pp. 741–752). Springer International Publishing.
McKinney, W. P. (2017). Assessing the evidence for the educational efficacy of webinars and related internet-based instruction. Pedagogy Health Promotion: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3, 47S–51S.
Meyer-Drawe, K. (2012). Diskurse des Lernens [Discourses of learning] (2nd ed.). Wilhelm Fink.
Momtpoint-Galliard, P. (2015). Transversal attitudes, skills and knowledge (TASKs) for a democratic culture and intercultural understanding. In F. Arató & A. Varga (Eds.), Inclusive university: How to increase academic excellence focusing on the aspects of inclusion (pp. 105–114). Bolko-Print Press.
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning. Making the connection. OECD Publishing.
Olson, J. S., & McCracken, F. E. (2014). Is it worth the effort? The impact of incorporating synchronous lectures into an online course. Online Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.499
Ørnes, H., Wilhelmsen, J., Breivik, J., & Solstad, K. J. (2011). Digital tilstand i høyere utdanning 2011: Norgesuniversitetets monitor [Digital state of higher education 2011: The Norwegian University Monitor] (vol. nr. 1/2011). Norgesuniversitetet.
Ottestad, G., Kelentrić, M., & Guðmundsdóttir, G. (2014). Professional Digital Competence in Teacher Education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(4), 243–249.
Peña‐Casas R., Ghailani D., & Coster S. (2018). The impact of digitalisation on job quality in European public services. The case of homecare and employment service workers. Final Report. European Social Observatory (OSE) and European Public Service Union (EPSU).
Robideau, K., & Matthes, K. (2021). Using webinars to teach extension audiences: A rubric to evaluate and improve. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 9(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.54718/WADO4568
Romano, M. (2002). Training teachers for quality education in Europe. European Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 11–17.
UN. (2011). Education for sustainable development. An expert review of processes and learning. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/education-sustainable-development-expert-review-processes-andlearning- 17696
UN. (2022). Transforming education summit. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/transforming-education-summit/sg-vision-statement
UNESCO. (2005). Contributing to a more sustainable future: quality education, life skills and education for sustainable development. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2011). ICT competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
UNESCO (2012). Education for sustainable development. Sourcebook. Learning & training tools N°4 – 2012. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216383.locale=en
UNESCO. (2021). Teachers have their say: motivation, skills and opportunities to teach education for sustainable development and global citizenship. UNESCO.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2021). SDG 4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. UNESCO. http://tcg.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2020/09/Metadata-4
Säljö, R. (2019). Materiality, learning, and cognitive practices: Artifacts as instruments of thinking. In T. Cerrato-Pargman &I. Jahnke (Eds.), Emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies (pp. 21–32). Springer.
Symeonidis, V. (2021). Europeanisation in teacher education. A comparative case study of teacher education policies and practices. Routledge.
Vuori, V., Helander, N., & Okkonen J. (2019). Digitalization in knowledge work: the dream of enhanced performance. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(2), 237–252.
Westa, S. (2020). Professionalisation through internationalisation in teacher education. The International Project. https://www.frse.org.pl/brepo/panel_repo_files/2021/05/14/bohw3o/tepe-tom-1-online-westa-sina.pdf
Winslade, M. (2016). Can an international field experience assist health and physical education preservice teachers to develop cultural competency? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264172. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2016.1264172
Wiseman, A. W., & Anderson, E. (2014). Annual review of comparative and international education 2014. Emerald Groups Publishing Limited.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
