Inovativne učne dejavnosti za etnično raznolike učence v makedonskem naravoslovnem izobraževanju
Povzetek
Pristop, ki temelji na igrah, se pogosto uporablja za povečanje motiva-cije učencev z njihovim aktivnim sodelovanjem, pri čemer se raziskova-nje prepleta z zabavo, tekmovalnost pa s sodelovanjem. Delo v ekipah ali skupinah učence spodbuja, da izmenjujejo svoja mnenja, poskušajo skupaj poiskati rešitve ali zmagati v igri. Tako se učijo in izboljšujejo spretnosti, kot sta sodelovanje in odgovornost. Pri pouku naravoslov-ja (kemije, biologije in fizike) je bilo uporabljenih več dejavnosti, ki so vključevale model 5E kot del na raziskovanju temelječega naravoslov-nega izobraževanja in sobo pobega kot del na igri temelječega učenja. Dejavnosti so bile zasnovane na tri različne teme – plini, ekologija in električna vezja – v okviru projekta DiSSI (Diversity in Science towards Social Inclusion – Non-formal Education in Science for Students’ Di-versity). Dejavnosti so se osredinjale na samopodobo učencev v odnosu do naravoslovja, ter zanimanje za predmet pri učencih, njihovo motiva-cijo in poklicne želje na področju STEM ter na učinkovitost izvedenih dejavnosti. Namen študije je bil oceniti potencialne prednosti izvajanja dejavnosti v etnično raznolikem okolju, ki koristijo učencem in učite-ljem. Pripravljeni so bili vprašalniki pred izvedbo dejavnosti in po njej; razdeljeni so bili 190 učencem iz različnih osnovnih in srednjih šol v Makedoniji. V tem prispevku sta predstavljena pregled na igri temelje-čih dejavnosti ter kratka analiza odgovorov učencev pred izpolnitvijo vprašalnika in po njej, pri čemer se osredinjamo na temo ekologije.
Prenosi
Literatura
Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3
Bartlett, K., & Anderson, J. (2019). Using an Escape Room to Support the Learning of Science Content. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 710–715. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207719
Chen, A., Darst, P.W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (1999). What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0303_3
Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158578
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
Dietrich, N. (2018). Escape classroom: The Leblanc process – An educational escape game”. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 996–999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00690
Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21–31.
Dugnol-Menéndez, J., Jiménez-Arberas, E., Ruiz-Fernández, M. L, Valera-Fernández, D., Mok, A., & Marayo Lloves J. (2021). A collaborative escape room as gamification strategy to increase learning motivation and develop curricular skills of occupational therapy students. BMC Med Educ, 21(544). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02973-5
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5
Gentry, S. V., Gauthier, A., Ehrstrom, B. L., Wortley, D., Lilienthal, A., Car, L. T., Dauwels-Okutsu, S., Nikolaou, C. K., Zary, N., & Campbell, J. (2019). Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/12994
Gordillo, A., López-Fernández, D., López-Pernas S., & Quemada, J. (2020). Evaluating an educational escape room conducted remotely for teaching software engineering, IEEE Access, 8, 225032–225051. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3044380
Hakulinen, L., & Auvinen, T. (2014). The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), IEEE, Kuching, Malaysia, 9–16. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6821820
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). LEA.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Karageorgiou, Z., Mavrommati, E., Fotaris P., & Christopoulou, E. (2020). Escape room in education: Evaluating using Experience Pyramid Model. 5th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM), Corfu, Greece, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM49515.2020.9221798
Kier, M.W., Blanchard, M.R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS), Research in Science Education, 44, 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward, MIT Press.
Korkmaz, Ö. Ç. R., & Erdoğmuş, F. U. (2020). A validity and reliability study of the Basic STEM Skill Levels Perception Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2020.02.010
Lathwesen, C., & Belova, N. (2021). Escape rooms in STEM teaching and learning – Prospective field or declining trend? A literature review. Education Sciences, 11(6), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060308
Lee, Y., Capraro M. M., & Viruru. R. (2018). The factors motivating students' STEM career aspirations: Personal and societal contexts. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(5), 36–48.
Luttenberger, S., Paechter, M., & Ertl, B. (2019). Self-concept and support experienced in school as key variables for the motivation of women enrolled in STEM subjects with a low and moderate proportion of females. Frontiers in Psychology, 26(10), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01242
Marín, S., de Atauri, P. R., Moreno, E., Pérez-Torras, S., Farràs, J., Imperial, S., Cascante, M., & Centelles, J. J. (2021). An escape-room about Krebs cycle prepared for chemical students. International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology (IJonEST), 3(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonest.59
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.82.4.646
Naumovska, A., Dimeski, H., & Stojanovska, M. (2023). Using the Escape Room game-based approach in chemistry teaching. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 88(5), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC211228088N
OECD (2009). PISA 2006: Technical report. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/42025182.pdf
Plump, C. M., & Meisel, S. I. (2020). Escape the traditional classroom: Using live-action games to engage students and strengthen concept retention. Management Teaching Review, 5(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298119837615
Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sellami, A., Santhosh, M., Bhadra, J., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). High school students' STEM interests and career aspirations in Qatar: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13898
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students' interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Coelho, J. A. P. M., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students' learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learn. Environ, 7, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019
Stojanovska, M. (2021). Celebrating the International Year of Periodic Table with chemistry educational games and puzzles. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0012
Stojanovska, M., Barandovski, L., Rusevska, K., & Petrusevski, V. (2022). Science through research and fun. Diversity in Science towards Social Inclusion – Non-Formal Education in Science for Students' Diversity. Activity Book. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics – Skopje.
Stojanovska, M., Mijić, I., & Petruševski, V. M. (2020a). Challenges and recommendations for improving chemistry education and teaching in the Republic of North Macedonia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.732
Stojanovska, M., Milanović, V., & Trivić, D. (2020b). Escape room – teachers approved! Chemistry in Action, 116(49), 49–53. https://www.chemistryireland.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Chemistryin-Action-Autumn-2020-Issue-116.pdf
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tvarozek, J., & Brza, T. (2014). Engaging students in online courses through interactive badges. International Conference on e-Learning, Spain, 89–95. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fe68/5176c8d4bf7f6507f3870815f56a65097c89.pdf
Veldkamp, A., Knippels, M-C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2021). Beyond the early adopters: Escape rooms in science education. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.622860
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312436980
Yu, Z., Gao, M. & Wang, L. (2020). The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach's alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
