Stališča učiteljev do hospitacij
Povzetek
Hospitacije omogočajo učiteljevo profesionalno rast in zagotavljajo akademsko odličnost šole, zato morajo predstavljati eno izmed njenih prednostnih področij. V raziskavi, katere glavni cilj je bil preučiti stališča učiteljev do kolegialnih in ravnateljevih hospitacij, smo se osredinili na doživljanja, izkušnje in na pričakovanja učiteljev, ki jih gojijo v povezavi s hospitacijami, merila, ki se jim zdijo pomembna za učinkovito izvedbo hospitacije, konkretne spremembe, ki so jih vnesli v svoj pouk na podlagi prejetih povratnih informacij po hospitaciji, ter na razvoj stališč do hospitacij skozi leta učiteljeve profesionalne kariere. V raziskavi je sodelovalo 73 učiteljev iz treh osnovnih in ene srednje šole. Za zbiranje podatkov smo uporabili vprašalnik. Kvalitativni podatki, ki so bili analizirani z uporabo kodiranja, so nam omogočili razumevanje stališč učiteljev do hospitacij, s kvantitativnimi podatki pa smo ugotovitve dodatno podprli. Študija je pokazala, da učitelji na splošno gojijo pozitivna stališča do hospitacij. Njihova pričakovanja se večinoma osredinjajo na povratne informacije, za katere želijo, da so konstruktivne, jih opolnomočijo z idejami za nadaljnje delo in so v pomoč pri samorefleksiji. Večina sprememb, uvedenih v pedagoško prakso na podlagi povratnih informacij, se nanaša na vodenje razreda in spremembo učnih metod. Učitelji hospitacije povezujejo tudi z nadzorom, birokracijo, s pritiskom in stresom. Z leti poučevanja se posameznikov odnos do hospitacij navadno izboljšuje. Kolegialne in ravnateljeve hospitacije so učiteljem v izziv, kljub temu pa so kolegialne hospitacije med učitelji zaznane kot uporabnejše, čeprav je izražen dvom o učiteljevi pristranskosti, ko hospitira kolegu.
Prenosi
Literatura
Adhikari, B. R. (2019). Use of peer observation for self-enhancement. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v2i0.26599
Ambrož, A. (2014). Medpredmetno načrtovanje in medsebojne hospitacije kot obliki profesionalnega razvoja učiteljev [Cross-curricular planning and peer observations as a form of teachers’ professional development]. Vodenje v vzgoji in izobraževanju, 2, 97–114.
Barber, M., Chijioke, C., & Mourshed, M. (2010). Education: How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Company.
Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
Bognar, B., & Krumes, I. (2017). Encouraging reflection and critical friendship in preservice teacher education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.289
Bush, T., & Middlewood, D. (2013). Leading and managing people in education. SAGE.
Chen, P. H., Hong, J. C., Ye, J. H., & Ho, Y. J. (2022). The role of teachers’ constructivist beliefs in classroom observations: A social cognitive theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904181
Danielson, C. (2014). The framework for teaching: evaluation instrument (2013 ed). Danielson Group.
Day, C., Sammons, P., & Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust.
Debeljak, M., Dominko, C., Gimbač, T., Keršnik, J., Krajnik, K., & Vehovec, M. (2012). Medsebojne hospitacije kot strategije vodenja za učenje. [Peer observations as the strategy of leadership for learning]. Vodenje v vzgoji in izobraževanju, 23(4), 61–75.
Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., Hondrich, A. L., Rieser, S., Hertel, S., & Hardy, I. (2015). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting science understanding? American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1133–1159. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215596412
Denton, P. (2019). Refreshing peer observation through walkabout weeks: Observers as voyagers, not vampires. Innovations in Practice, 13(1), 5–9.
Education First. (2014). Classroom observations – Measuring teachers’ professional practices. Education First. https://www.education-first.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/01-Gates_Eval-and-Support-Strategies-for-Success_ClassObservations.pdf
Engin, M. (2014). Observing teaching: A lens for self-reflection. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v2i2.90
Erčulj, J. (2014). Ravnatelj kot spodbujevalec v učenca usmerjenega poučevanja in sodelovanja [Principal as the promoter of student-oriented teaching and cooperation]. Vodenje v vzgoji in izobraževanju, 12(2), 79–96.
Erčulj, J. (2015). Spremljanje in opazovanje pouka: Ravnateljeve in medsebojne hospitacije [Monitoring and observing teaching: Supervisory and peer observation]. In M. Zavašnik Arčnik & J. Erčulj (Eds.), Izbrana poglavja iz vodenja v vzgoji in izobraževanju [Selected chapters on leadership in education] (pp. 27–50). Šola za ravnatelje.
Goble, P., & Pianta, R.C. (2022). Observation as a lever for teacher improvement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE118-1
Hallam, P. R., Smith, H. R., Hite, J. M., Hite, S. J., & Wilcox, B. R. (2015). Trust and collaboration in PLC teams: Teacher relationships, principal support, and collaborative benefits. NASSP Bulletin, 99(3), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636515602330
Hill, H., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.2.d11511403715u376
Hinchey, P. H. (2010). Getting teacher assessment right: What policymakers can learn from research. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/getting-teacher-assessment-right
Jacob, B., & Lefgen, L. (2006). When principals rate teachers: The best - and the worst - stand out. Education Next, 6(2), 58–64.
Johnson, B., Martinez-Berman, L., & Curley, C. (2022, September 15). Formation of Attitudes: How People (Wittingly or Unwittingly) Develop Their Viewpoints. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Retrieved September 20, 2023, from https://oxfordre.com/psychology/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore9780190236557-e-812
Khan, S. I. (2019). Teachers’ attitude towards peer observation at the Najran University: A case study. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2350
Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering department chair instructional leadership capacity: Laying the groundwork for distributed instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.577910
Kordeš, U., & Smrdu, M. (2015). Osnove kvalitativnega raziskovanja [Fundamentals of qualitative research]. University of Primorska Press.
Krašna, M., & Gartner, S. (2008). E-hospitacije [E-observations]. Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3/4), 55–66.
Mette, I. M., Range, B. G., Anderson, J., Hvidson, D. J., & Nieuwenhuizen, L. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of teacher supervision and evaluation: A reflection of school improvement practices in the age of reform. Education Leadership Review, 16(1), 16–30.
Motallebzadeh, K., Hosseinnia, M., & Domskey, J. G. H. (2017). Peer observation: A key factor to improve Iranian EFL teachers’ professional development. Cogent Education, 4(1), Article 1277456. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1277456
Oder Grabner, M. (2010). Hospitacije: nujno zlo ali dobrodošla pomoč [Observations: a necessary evil or a welcome help]. In Znanje: teorija in praksa: zbornik 6. študentske konference Fakultete za management Koper [Knowledge: theory and practice: proceedings of the 6th Student Conference of the Faculty of Management Koper] (pp. 603–609). University of Primorska, Faculty of Management.
OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
O’Leary, M. (2020). Classroom observation: A guide to the effective observation of teaching and learning. Routledge.
Organisation and Financing of Education Act. (1996). Official Gazette of Republic of Slovenia, No. 12/96 as of 29 November 1996. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia. https://zakonodaja.sio.si/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/OFEA_npb_170605.pdf
Pedagoški inštitut. (2020). Učitelji in ravnatelji, cenjeni strokovnjaki: izsledki mednarodne raziskave poučevanja in učenja TALIS 2018 [Teachers and school leaders as valued professional: Findings from TALIS 2018]. Educational Research Institute Slovenia. http://talispei.splet.arnes.si/files/2020/03/TALIS18-Ucitelji-in-ravnatelji-cenjeni-strokovnjaki.pdf
Pollard, A., & Collins, J. (2005). Reflective teaching: Evidence-informed professional practice. Continuum.
Pollock, K., Wang, F., & Hauseman, D. (2015). Complexity and volume: An inquiry into factors that drive principals’ work. Societies, 5(2), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020537
Popp, P. A., Grant, L. W., & Stronge, J. H. (2011). Effective teachers for at-risk or highly mobile students: What are the dispositions and behaviors of award-winning teachers? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 16(4), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2011.610236
Praetorius, A. K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: Looking back and looking forward. ZDM, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
Raike, A. (2020). Praxis, pedagogy and teachers’ professionalism in England. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 20(3), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.874
Range, B. G., Duncan, H. E., Scherz, S. D., & Haines, C. A. (2012). School leaders’ perceptions about incompetent teachers: Implications for supervision and evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 96(4), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636512459554
Range, B. G., Scherz, S., Holt, C. R., & Young, S. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5
Range, B. G., Young, S., & Hvidston, D. (2013). Teacher perceptions about observation conferences: What do teachers think about their formative supervision in one US school district? School Leadership & Management, 33(1), 61–77.
Sagadin, J. (1991). Kvalitativno empirično pedagoško raziskovanje [Qualitative empirical pedagogical research]. Sodobna pedagogika, 42(7/8), 343–355.
Santos, D., & Miguel, L. (2017). How do teachers make sense of peer observation professional development in an urban school. International Education Studies, 10(1), 255–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n1p255
Šarić, M., & Šteh, B. (2017). Critical reflection in the professional development of teachers: Challenges and possibilities. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.288
Sivan, A., & Chan, D. W. K. (2009). The roles of supervised teaching practice and peer observation in teacher education in Hong Kong: Implications for partnership. Teacher Development, 13(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530903335590
Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Gervasoni, A. (2000). Caution: Classroom under observation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/713650693
Taylor, E., & Tyler, J. (2012). Can teacher evaluation improve teaching? Education Next, 12(4). https://www.educationnext.org/can-teacher-evaluation-improve-teaching/
Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno izobraževanje na pedagoškem področju [Qualitative training in teaching]. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education.
Volchenkova, K. (2016). Peer observation as a tool for teacher’s professional development and the way to increase the quality of the education process. Educational Sciences, 8(3), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.14529/ped160304
Zatynski, M. (2012). Revamping teacher evaluation. Principal, 91(5), 22–27.
Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315855523
Copyright (c) 2026 Melita Lemut Bajec
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
