Postati angažiran plesni strokovnjak prek umetniško zasnovanih projektov za vključevanje skupnosti

  • Lynnette Young Overby University of Delaware, Newark; Arnhold Institute for Dance Education, Research, Policy & Leadership, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
  • Diana Crum Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
  • Jill Grundstrom Northern Michigan University, Marquette; Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
  • Francine E. Ott Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
  • Melissa van Wijk Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2002
Ključne besede: na umetnosti temelječe raziskovanje, vključevanje skupnosti, ocenjevanje, ples, visokošolsko izobraževanje

Povzetek

Podiplomski študentje plesne pedagogike lahko razvijejo prakso angaži­ranega, na umetnosti temelječega raziskovanja, tako da svoje strokovno znanje uporabijo v sodelovanju s partnerji iz skupnosti pri izvedbi pro­jektov, ki koristijo lokalnim, regionalnim in/ali globalnim skupnostim, ter hkrati prispevajo k njihovemu lastnemu raziskovalnemu delu. Ta članek analizira sedem projektov na umetnosti temelječega raziskovanja, ki so obvezen del predmeta Studio Seminar za doktorske študente plesne peda­gogike na Teachers College Univerze Columbia. Cilji raziskave so bili: a) oceniti raven vključenosti skupnosti v sedmih projektih Studio Seminar; b) ugotoviti, ali so bila v projektih izpolnjena merila evokacije (sproža­nje estetskega ali reflektivnega odziva) in osvetlitve (prikaz ali osvetlitev kompleksne teme skozi umetniško prakso); c) raziskati, kakšno znanje so pridobili študentje, ki so pri projektih sodelovali in jih reflektirali. V razi­skavi sta sodelovali dve skupini študentov: skupina 1 (trije udeleženci), ki je predmet zaključila leta 2021, in skupina 3 (štirje udeleženci), ki je pred­met zaključila leta 2023. Podatki so bili zbrani in analizirani na podlagi meril za ocenjevanje na umetnosti temelječega raziskovanja – evokacije in osvetlitve – ter meril za vključevanje skupnosti, kot sta soustvarjanje in souporaba. Rezultati kažejo, da so bila merila vključevanja skupnosti prisotna v vseh projektih; soustvarjanje je bilo prisotno pri vseh, medtem ko je bila souporaba značilna predvsem za projekte skupine 1. Poleg tega sta bili evokacija in osvetlitev izraženi v vseh sedmih projektih. Rezultati vprašalnika o vključevanju skupnosti so pokazali, da so projekti pozitivno vplivali na študente glede njihovih študijskih ciljev in prihodnjih načr­tov za projekte v sodelovanju s skupnostjo. Sklepno lahko ugotovimo, da usmerjanje podiplomskih študentov plesa k razvoju projektov na umetno­sti temelječega raziskovanja v povezavi s skupnostjo prispeva k njihovemu oblikovanju kot angažiranih raziskovalcev.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts based research. SAGE Publications Inc.

Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824459

Campus Compact. (n.d.). What is engaged scholarship? A resource collection. https://compact.org/resources/what-is-engaged-scholarship-a-resource-collection?f%255B0%255D%3Dpractice_area=198

Changfoot, N., Andree, P., Levkoe, C. Z., Nilson, M., & Goemans, M. (2020). Engaged scholarship in tenure and promotion: Autoethnographic insights from the fault lines of a shifting landscape. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.114

da Cruz, C. G. (2018). Community-engaged scholarship: Toward a shared understanding of practice. The Review of Higher Education, 41(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0000

Dailey, R., & Hauschild-Mork, M. (2017). Making it all count: A cross-disciplinary collaboration model incorporating scholarship, creative activity, and student engagement. InSight a Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 12, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.46504/12201704da

Duffy, A. (2019). Developing a service-learning project within a university choreography course. Dance Education in Practice, 5(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23734833.2019.1565502

Ellison, J., & Eatman, T. (2008). Scholarship in public: Knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university. Imagining America.

Giguere, M. (2019). The impact of community engagement through dance on teen and young adult dancers. In K. Bond (Ed.), Social indicators research series (pp. 263–280). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95699-2_15

Heron, H. (n.d.). Embodied expressions [Photograph]. F. E. Ott Personal collection.

Lang, D. (1936). Migrant mother [Photograph]. https://moma.org/collection/works/50989

Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press.

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.

Lesley, M. K., & Smit, J. (2020). Teaching as we learn: Mentoring graduate students in engaged scholarship. In A. Zimmerman (Ed.), Preparing students for community-engaged scholarship in higher education (pp. 62–83). IGI Global. https://doi.org10.4018/978-1-7998-2208-0.ch004

Mabingo, A. (2018). Teaching African dances as civic engagement: Pedagogic perspectives of teachers of African dances in North America, Europe, New Zealand, and Asia. Journal of Dance Education, 18(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2018.1482417

Matthews, P. H., Karls, A. C., Doberneck, D. M., & Springer, N. C. (2015). Portfolio and certification programs in community engagement as professional development for graduate students: Lessons learned from two land-grant universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19, 157–184.

Moffett, A. (2025). Arts-based research in dance. In L. Overby, J. Shanahan, & G. Young (Eds.), Undergraduate research in dance: A guide for students (2nd ed., pp. 56–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003436287-7

O’Connor, K. M., Lynch, K., & Owen, D. (2011). Student‐community engagement and the development of graduate attributes. Education + Training, 53(2/3), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911111115654

O’Meara, K., Eatman, T., & Petersen, S. (2015). Advancing engaged scholarship in promotion and tenure: A roadmap and call for reform. Liberal Education, 101(3), 52–57.

O’Meara, K., & Jaeger, A. J. (2006). Preparing future faculty for community engagement: Barriers, facilitators, models and recommendations. Journal of Higher Education and Outreach, 11(4), 3–27.

Overby, L. Y. (2016). Public scholarship in dance: Teaching, choreography, research, service, and assessment for community engagement. Human Kinetics.

Overby, L. Y. (2022). Arts-based research for undergraduate students. In Mieg, H., Ambos, E., Brew, A. Galli D., & Lehmann J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of undergraduate research (pp. 371–378). Cambridge University Press.

Overby, L. Y., Ruberto, D., Moffett, A., & Green, R., (2025). Mary Ann Shadd Cary, her life and legacy – A production. In K. Moriah (Ed.), Insensible of boundaries – Studies of Mary Ann Shadd Cary (pp. 97–120). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://www.pennpress.org/9781512826616/insensible-of-boundaries/

Purvis, D. (2018). Dance scholarship and community engagement: A literature review of the Journal of Dance Education. Journal of Dance Education, 18(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2017.1360495

Risner, D. (2010). Dance education matters: Rebuilding postsecondary dance education for twenty-first century relevance and resonance. Journal of Dance Education, 10(4), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2010.529761

Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Warburton, E. C., Reedy, P., & Ng, N. (2014). Engaging families in dance: An investigation of moving parents and children together. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 15(1), 1–26.

Wilson, L., & Moffett, A.T. (2017). Building bridges for dance through arts-based research. Research in Dance Education, 18(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2017.1330328

Objavljeno
2025-06-27
Kako citirati
Young Overby, L., Crum, D., Grundstrom, J., E. Ott, F., & van Wijk, M. (2025). Postati angažiran plesni strokovnjak prek umetniško zasnovanih projektov za vključevanje skupnosti. Revija Centra Za študij Edukacijskih Strategij , 15(2), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2002
Številka
Letn. 15 Št. 2 (2025): Toward Fulfilling the Gap Between Arts Policy and Practice
Rubrike
FOCUS

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
  2. The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.