Through Thick and Thin: Lower Secondary School Students’ Barriers to Learning under Covid-19 Conditions
Abstract
At the global level, the Covid-19 pandemic has affected the whole education system, ranging from pre-school to higher education. Without any prior preparation, the teaching process has undergone a massive transition from face-to-face to distance learning. This transition has posed many challenges. This article aims to reveal what barriers to learning lower secondary school students face and how schools can minimise these barriers. A systematic review of the academic literature from two well-known databases, EBSCO and ScienceDirect, was performed to identify and determine the prevailing consistencies and gaps. The empirical study follows a qualitative research design: an explanatory case study. The data were collected through observations of online lessons, interviews with teachers and the school principal, and students’ reflections. In addition, an inductive thematic analysis was employed. The empirical results help to identify secondary school students’ barriers to learning in terms of learning accessibility and technological literacy; planning and reflections on learning; self-regulated learning and active involvement; and emotional and psychological well-being. Furthermore, the study highlights how a school can minimise these barriers.
Downloads
References
Acar, A., & Kayaoglu, M. N. (2020). MOODLE as a potential tool for language education under the shadow of Covid-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 90, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.90.4
Bhaumik, R., & Priyadarshini, A. (2020). E-readiness of senior secondary school learners to online learning transition amid Covid -19 lockdown. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 244–256.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Brown, R. B. (2006). Doing your dissertation in business and management: The reality of research and writing. Sage Publications.
Chapman, S., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Momentum for math: Help students become active learning partners in online classrooms. Learning Professional, 41(3), 30–34.
Chen, I. (2020). Correlation between self-efficacy and English performance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8), 223–234.
Dube, B. (2020). Rural online learning in the context of Covid -19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2020.5607
Ebner, C., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2019). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 4, 92, 1–19.
Elmer, T., Mepham, K., & Stadtfeld, C. (2020). Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the Covid -19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE 15(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236337
Espinosa Castro, T. (2020). Covid -19 and risks for disadvantaged students: a media coverage analysis from a cultural psychology perspective. Intercultural Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2020.1800922
Harris, H., & Jones, M. (2020). Covid-19 – school leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
Hosszu, A., & Rughiniș, C. (2020). Digital divides in education. An analysis of the Romanian public discourse on distance and online education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sociologie Românească, 18(2), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.33788/sr.18.2.1
Hall, P. A., & Simeral, A. (2017). Creating a culture of reflective practice: Building capacity for schoolwide success. ASCD.
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2020). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 3(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
Kaden, U. (2020). Covid-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165
Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48, 865–885.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during Covid -19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018) Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Kruszewska, A., Nazaruk, S., & Szewczyk, K. (2020). Polish teachers of early education in the face of distance learning during the Covid -19 pandemic – the difficulties experienced and suggestions for the future. Education, 3(13), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1849346
Lau, E. Y. H., & Lee, K. (2020). Parents’ views on young children’s distance learning and screen time during Covid -19 class suspension in Hong Kong. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1843925
Liman, B., & Tepeli, K. (2019). A study on the effects of self-regulation skills education program on self-regulation skills of six-year-old children. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(18), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3853
Martinez, A., Mcmahon, S. D., Coker, C., & Keys, C. B. (2016). Teacher behavioral practices: Relations to student risk behaviors, learning barriers, and school climate. Psychology in the Schools, 53(8), 817–830.
McManus, D., Dryer, R., & Henning, M. (2017). Barriers to learning online experienced by students with a mental health disability. Distance Education, 38(3), 336–352.
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
Midcalf, L., & Boatwright, P. (2020). Teacher and parent perspectives of the online learning environment due to Covid-19. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators, 87(1), 24–34.
Petroski, D. J., & Rogers, D. (2020). An examination of student responses to a suddenly online learning environment: What we can learn from gameful instructional approaches. The Journal of Literacy and Technology, Special Issue, 102–129.
Pietro, M., & Madonna, G. (2020). Difficult inclusion and physical activity for distance didactics. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(4), 2386–2391. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s4325
Sayed, M., & Baker, F. (2014). Blended learning barriers: An investigation, exposition and solutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 81–85.
Saphier, J., Haley-Speca, M. A., & Gower, R. (2008). The skillful teacher: Building your teaching skills 6th Ed.). Research for Better Teaching, Inc., Acton, 5.
Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328–360.
Tanık-Önal, N., & Önal, N. (2020). Teaching science through distance education during the covid-19 pandemic. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(4), 1898–1911.
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). COVID-19 impact on education. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
United Nations Human Rights (2020). Covid-19 and the rights of persons with disabilities: Guidance. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/COVID-19_and_The_Rights_of_Persons_with_Disabilities.pdf
Wyness, M., & Lang, P. (2016). The social and emotional dimensions of schooling: A case study in challenging the ‘barriers to learning’. British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 1041–1055 https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3245
Webb, N. M. (2010). Peer learning in the classroom. In International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
