Učiteljevo zaznavanje ocenjevalnih praks in povratnih informacij pri pouku tujega jezika na Finskem med pandemijo covida-19
Povzetek
V prispevku preučujemo, kako je pandemija covida-19 vplivala na kakovost učiteljevega ocenjevanja in podajanja povratnih informacij pri pouku tujega jezika na Finskem med poukom na daljavo spomladi 2020. V finskih učnih načrtih so poudarjene večplastne prakse ocenjevanja in podajanja povratnih informacij; te predstavljajo osrednji vidik učenja. Zato smo preučevali, kako učitelji zaznavajo svoje prakse ocenjevanja in posredovanje povratnih informacij na različnih ravneh šole v obdobju poučevanja na daljavo ter kako upoštevajo obdobje poučevanja na daljavo pri sklepnem ocenjevanju učencev ob koncu osnovnega izobraževanja. Podatki so bili zbrani s spletnim vprašalnikom ter analizirani s kvantitativnimi in kvalitativnimi metodami. Večina izmed 176 anketirancev je menila, da se prakse ocenjevanja in posredovanja povratnih informacij izvajajo uspešno ter da je končna ocena realna in zanesljiva. A zaznavanja učiteljev glede več vprašanj so bila različna, ugotovljene pa so bile tudi razlike v količini in obliki povratnih informacij med anketiranci in ravnmi šol ter v tem, katere izražene kompetence ali naloge se upoštevajo pri končni oceni. Poleg tega je imelo obdobje pouka na daljavo običajno manjši vpliv na končno oceno učencev kot zadnjih nekaj mesecev osnovnega izobraževanja. Izsledki kažejo, da bi bilo treba več pozornosti nameniti izboljšanju prakse posredovanja povratnih informacij in povezovanju z učenci v obdobjih poučevanja na daljavo.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ahtiainen, R., Asikainen, M., Heikonen, L., Hienonen, N., Hotulainen, R., Lindfors, P., Lindgren, E., Lintuvuori, M., Oinas, S., Rimpelä, A., & Vainikainen, M–P. (2020). Koulunkäynti, opetus ja hyvinvointi kouluyhteisössä koronaepidemian aikana: Ensitulokset [Schoolgoing, teaching and well-being in school community during the corona pandemic: Initial results]. HEA, NEDIS, REAL.
Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2014). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Dewaele, J.–M. (2018). Online questionnaires. In A. Phakiti, P. DeCosta, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 269–286). Palgrave Macmillan.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2020). Education services and the coronavirus.
https://www.oph.fi/en/news/2020/education-services-and-coronavirus
FNBE [National core curriculum for basic education 2014]. (2016a). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.
FNBE [National core curriculum for general upper secondary schools 2015]. (2016b). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, J. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. Routledge.
Hilli, C. (2020). Distance teaching in small rural primary schools: A participatory action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(1), 38–52.
Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.
Linnakylä, P., & Välijärvi, J. (2005). Arvon mekin ansaitsemme. Kansainvälinen arviointi suomalaisen koulun kehittämiseksi [Worthy of recognition? International assessment and the development of the Finnish School]. Ps-Kustannus.
Mackey, A., Park, H. I., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2016). Errors, corrective feedback and repair: variations and learning outcomes. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 499–512). Routledge.
Mäkipää, T., & Ouakrim–Soivio, N. (2019). Perceptions of Finnish upper secondary school students of the assessment practices of their teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 23–42.
Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369.
Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.) (2016). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd Rev. Ed.). Sense Publishers.
OAJ [Trade Union of Teachers in Finland]. (2020). OAJ:n kysely koskien opetuksen poikkeusjärjestelyjä keväällä 2020. Tiivistelmä [Survey regarding the exceptional teaching arrangements in spring 2020. Summary] https://www.oaj.fi/ajankohtaista/uutiset-ja-tiedotteet/2020/koronavirus-kysely/
Pollari, P. (2020). “Mitä pitäisi kehittää ja miten?†Lukiolaisten kokemuksia arvioinnista ja sen menetelmistä englannin opinnoissa [â€What should be improved and how?†Students’ experiences of assessment and its methodology in their upper secondary English studiesâ€]. In R. Hildén & K. Hahl (Eds.), Kielididaktiikan katse tulevaisuuteen: haasteita, mahdollisuuksia ja uusia avauksia kielten opetukseen (pp. 153–171). Suomen ainedidaktisen tutkimusseuran julkaisuja, Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 17.
Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 190–208.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Using feedback to improve learning. Routledge.
Simons, J., Leverett, S., & Beaumont, K. (2020). Success of distance learning graduates and the
role of intrinsic motivation. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 277–293.
Simonson, M., & Seepersaud, D. J. (2019). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (4th Ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Statistics Finland. (2021). Education. https://www.stat.fi/til/kou_en.html
Stenman, S., & Pettersson, F. (2020). Remote teaching for equal and inclusive education in rural areas? An analysis of teachers’ perspectives on remote teaching. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 87–98.
SUKOL (The Federation of Foreign Language Teachers in Finland). (2020).
https://www.sukol.fi/liitto/mika_sukol_on/other_languages
Tanhua–Piiroinen, E., Kaarakainen, S–S., Kaarakainen, M–T., & Viteli, J. (2020). Digiajan peruskoulu II [Comprehensive schools in the digital age II]. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2020.
Taras, M. (2005). Assessment – summative and formative - some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.
Toppin, I. N., & Toppin, S. M. (2016). Virtual schools: The changing landscape of K–12 education in the U.S. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1571–1581.
Tsagari, D. (2016). Assessment orientations of state primary EFL teachers in two Mediterranean countries. CEPS Journal, 6(1), 9–30.
Vanhatalo, U., & Vehkalahti, K. (2020). Kysely [Questionnaire]. In M. Luodonpää–Manni, M. Hamunen, R. Konstenius, M. Miestamo, U. Nikanne, & K. Sinnemäki (Eds.), Kielentutkimuksen menetelmiä (pp. 240–273). SKS.
Venäläinen, S. (2020). Etäopetus ja tasa-arvo [Remote teaching and equality]. Tempus 5/2020, 12–13.
Vocational Education and Training Act. (531/2017). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170531
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
